Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keeping It Frozen—In Alaska, a low-tech solution helps the ground stay cold enough, for now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:38 PM
Original message
Keeping It Frozen—In Alaska, a low-tech solution helps the ground stay cold enough, for now
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704576204574531373037560240.html
DECEMBER 7, 2009

Keeping It Frozen

In Alaska, a low-tech solution helps the ground stay cold enough, for now

By JIM CARLTON

FAIRBANKS, Alaska—While the world debates the causes of climate change and what, if anything, to do about it, Alaskans are busy dealing with its consequences.

Permafrost, the frozen ground that lies just beneath the surface in most of the state, has become less stable in many areas, thanks in part to higher average air temperatures. It has begun to thaw in the warmer months and refreeze in the winter, causing shifts that wreak havoc on the structural integrity of the pipelines, railways, roads and buildings that sit on top of it.

"If we're going to build on frozen ground, we want to keep it frozen," says Dan White, director of the Institute of Northern Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

To do that, engineers increasingly are turning to a low-tech solution: devices called thermosiphons that draw heat out of the ground. It's a solution that shows how effective even relatively simple ingenuity can be in the absence of a more comprehensive, policy-driven response to climate change. But Alaska's experience also shows the limits that such stopgap measures often run up against.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it apparent what they can do to reduce the "hot air"
Keeping Palin out of the state, for one...


But, in all seriousness, this is some good news for a change...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Heat pipes is another name for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmm ...
> "If we're going to build on frozen ground, we want to keep it frozen,"

Their "plan" addresses the second part of that sentence.
I really think they should address the "if" in the first part.

> Permafrost, the frozen ground that lies just beneath the surface
> in most of the state, has become less stable in many areas,
> thanks in part to higher average air temperatures.

Draw heat out of the ground and dump it into the atmosphere ...
that's a "good" move?

Specifically, drawing heat out of a few very localised places
in the ground and dumping it into already warming air around it
will simply (but expensively) move the problem sideway by a few metres.

Can't they see that they're fighting a seriously uphill battle in their
desperate attempt to maintain "Business As Usual"?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not so sure the heat they are removing from the frozen ground is
is having much effect on the whole scheme of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly ...
... it's not having much effect on their attempt for "Business As Usual"
either as it is literally only moving it a couple of metres vertically
then leaving it as a very localised (albeit low delta) heat source!

My objection wasn't that they were influencing any regional effects
but that they weren't even making significant progress at the local
level thus the money being spent on this attempt could be better utilised
elsewhere.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC