|
The sober predictions of science seem to indicate we are past the tipping point, and in spite of all the evidence accumulated, nothing is done. I think the failure of governmental entities to act rationally is one that we will see repeated over and over as years go by and conditions deteriorate, and I think the problem is that we are looking in the wrong place for solutions. Governments as they are represent the money and interests of industrialism, in all its forms. Industrialism itself is at the core of the problem, and its no mystery why it cannot “solve” itself.
The one solution that I can see is the simplest. Its fairly inevitable anyway, an aspect of our trajectory toward energy depletion, and has historically been a refuge in troubled times: deliberate poverty. We are accustomed to think of poverty as an indication of failure, lack of capacity or education, and as a detestable thing to be used to scare our children into studying with, a shameful thing to hide at all costs if it settled upon our households...
But inherently, it solves so many problems. It reduces energy consumption immediately: wealth and energy consumption correlate almost perfectly with only a few variations in efficiency. CO2 output unfailingly follows energy consumption. Consumption itself involves the redistribution of an individual's wealth to support all the products and endeavors of future industrialism. Wealth stored becomes the capital guaranteeing more wealth and capital, leading to more industrialism and wealth. An individual earning only what is needed, spending only what supports a modest life, hoarding nothing, has a minimal or negative impact upon industrialism.
One of the greatest misallocations of resources in human history (to differ from Kuntstler) is the US military. During the Bush years I was without a job for a time, and ended up with one paying significantly less. My consolation was that I no longer made enough to pay for his pointless wars. Its still a consolation, and as I watch the government both expand our war footing and fail to do anything useful on climate change, its apparent that failure is to be expected. Nothing can be expected from national governments dedicated to the economic growth at the heart of the problem, and to live in deliberate poverty is to remove oneself from the funding apparatus, to exist outside of the machinery in a position of perspective rather than involvement.
If, one at a time, people can make a difference, this is part of what I think it will look like: choosing deliberate poverty, cars are parked and not driven, and people walk and bicycle more. Not hoarding wealth and material objects, economic activity slows and limits to what is useful and local. The mountain of plastic crap shipped around the planet suddenly appears as a mountain of plastic crap, to newly opened eyes. When poverty is a choice made in the best interests of one's society and the planet as a whole, it is an indication of personal initiative, strength and sacrifice, and all those psychological things that drive people to drink and smoke are relieved. As physical demands are made upon the body, health is more important and expensive addictions are easier to be freed from, breaking one more bond of industrialism. The ceaseless activity pursuing wealth and its trappings begins to look like the thing that is destroying our families and our planet, while simplicity is something to relax into. Shopping as close to home and eating as close to the land as possible means using local produce and stores before those of strangers, and producing oneself what can be made at home...
Those are the thoughts of the week, watching all the bad news lately. The writing is a little weak and disorganized, but it is something to think about. To some extent, I don't see that there is really any choice in the matter in the medium-term. I tell my kids “smart people find ways to enjoy the things they have to do”, so I look at it as finding a way to stride through the future with a good attitude.
|