Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: High Levels of Radioactive Material Found in Water Outside Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:07 PM
Original message
Breaking: High Levels of Radioactive Material Found in Water Outside Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant
Burlington Free Press
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20100120/NEWS02/100120043/High-levels-of-radioactive-material-found-state-to-begin-independent-testing

Vermont state officials say more radioactive tritium has been found at the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant — at much higher levels than were found in a test well nearly two weeks ago.


William Irwin, the state’s radiological health chief, says readings of 1 million to 2 million picocuries per liter of the isotope were found in a concrete trench several hundred feet from the test well where tritium was reported on Jan. 7.


Meanwhile, state officials are calling for the state Health Department to conduct its own investigation and not rely on information from Vermont Yankee.


Vermont Yankee nuclear plant officials acknowledged today the company had misstated the test results released a day earlier and that, on further examination, the level of radioactive tritium in a sample taken from a second monitoring was not elevated.


On Tuesday, the company said the sample showed a tritium concentration of 9,450 picocuries per liter what was identified as the north monitoring well. A review of how the test was conducted determined the true amount was negligible.


Tritium is a hydrogen isotope that can be a radiation hazard when it is inhaled or ingested through food or water. The federal safety standard for tritium in drinking water is 20,000 picocuries per liter.


Irwin said the revised test result disclosed by Vermont Yankee nuclear plant was both good news and bad news.


“It reduces one concern but it replaces it with another concern,” Irwin said. “We’re concerned that the initial test result may be indicative of a lack of appropriate quality control in the sample analysis.”


Irwin said it appeared that a container used by Vermont Yankee during its analysis of the sample had a chemical residue inside of it that skewed the results. The correct, lower finding was determined when plant workers re-ran the test using a clean container.


Irwin said that as a result of Vermont Yankee’s testing mistake, his office plans to intensify its own testing program and independently analyze samples from all three plant monitoring wells, plus some 30 other potable and non-potable water wells in the vicinity of the plant.


The testing is being down to identify the source, location and size and seriousness of the tritium plume. Vermont Yankee has agreed to dig 11 more monitoring wells around the plant over the next few weeks to aid in that effort, Irwin said.


Last week, a monitoring well between the plant and the Connecticut River showed tritium levels of around 17,000 picocuries per liter. Tuesday, the company reported that the tritium concentration had grown to 22,300 picocuries per liter over the past two weeks.


The tritium groundwater contamination problem at Vermont Yankee was first disclosed two weeks ago. Last week, the plant came under fire for denying that underground pipes carrying tritium existed at the facility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Lighten up, Frances.
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 02:44 AM by jgraz
So you know a few things the OP doesn't. Why get so hostile? Do we criticize you for your complete lack of social skills?


Oh, and it's "repertoire", not "repetoir". If you're going to act like a condescending fool, at least turn on your spell check, Mkay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Wrong. Again.
you are going to argue that 50 times the national safety standard is OK? Seriously, the safety standard is 20,000 and yesterday they found 1,000,000. If you really think that's just fine I invite you to go drink some of it.

furthermore, this morning a medical doctor was on the radio explaining that having one glass of water with tritium in it might not be a problem but if it is in the water supply and people are consuming it regularly at these levels it absolutely will cause legions and cancer. That's from a medical doctor. So I'll stick with the federal safety standards and the testimony of a medical doctor, rather than a bias nuclar advocate who lurks on a website forum, if I'm looking for accurate information. Thanks and have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh right... I forgot the part where he's actually TOTALLY WRONG.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. *** DUZY ****
"Name Deleted" aka NNadir is TOTALLY WRONG ***AGAIN***
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC