Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China to move ahead on clean energy "combustible ice" (Oh great! They're burning methane hydrates!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 07:28 PM
Original message
China to move ahead on clean energy "combustible ice" (Oh great! They're burning methane hydrates!)
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-03/06/c_13200033.htm

China to move ahead on clean energy "combustible ice"

English.news.cn 2010-03-06 22:58:57

by Xinhua writers Wang Aihua, Miao Xiaojuan

BEIJING, March 6 (Xinhua) -- China's western Qinghai Province, containing major deposits of the country's "combustible ice," will see increased explorations for this emerging clean energy, Provincial Governor Luo Huining said on Saturday.

The plateau province plans to allow large energy companies along with researchers to tap this new source of energy while minimizing environmental threats, Luo said on the sidelines of the annual session of the National People's Congress (NPC), China's top legislature.

"Combustible ice," or natural gas hydrate, is mainly found in deep seas and atop plateaus. Approximately one cubic meter of "combustible ice" equals 164 cubic meters of regular natural gas.

At a time of energy bottlenecks, the new energy resource has drawn interest from many countries. Additional attention has focused on the "ice" having a low proportion of impurities, resulting in it generating almost no pollutants when burned.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not wonderful, but the way things are going, better to burn than not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agree
We'll still end up with CO2, but without the methane actually being in the atmosphere. So it's better than just letting it bubble up out of the ocean or permafrost...barely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not all methane hydrates will destabilize at once
Ones which are deeper in the ocean or colder will take longer to destabilize.

I suppose they'll tend to burn the shallowest first, since they will be the easiest to recover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We can hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC