Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Solar power’s dirty secrets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:09 PM
Original message
Solar power’s dirty secrets


"Maybe we should banish the term 'clean energy.' Growing corn for ethanol requires fertilizers and pesticides. Producing and shipping small-scale wind turbines for urban areas generates more CO2 than they save. Production of polysilicon for solar panels leaves a trail of toxic waste in China, as The Washington Post reported back in 2008.

Now a survey and scorecard that ranks solar energy firms points to potential environmental, health and safety issues associated with the production and disposal of solar photovoltaic panels–as well as the reluctance of some well-known industry players even to talk about their practices.

The survey comes from the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, an activist group that has produced similar scorecards of the computer and TV industries, designed the shame the laggards into reform. (In the argot of environmental activists, this tactic is known as 'rank ‘em and spank ‘em.') SVTC is calling for mandatory takeback and responsible recycling by solar companies as a step toward reducing the solar industry’s environmental footprint."

http://www.marcgunther.com/2010/03/30/solar-powers-dirty-secrets/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. We're doomed to sit in the dark or die of global warming

is that it?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Probably both. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's the spirit!


:rofl:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Hey, the dark was good enough for us for about three hundred thousand years
We're living in what amounts to an anomalous fluke of illumination.

And you might die of global warming. Me, I'm thinking i could go for the whole "desert cannibal" thing. I need some goggles and a mohawk though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ethanol should use the waste from food crops, not the easy juicy CORN.
Using corn itself is totally counterproductive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think we will find that all forms of energy have their dirty side.
But, we need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not really. While it is true that there is no such thing as risk free energy, some forms of energy
are worse than others.

Solar PV energy has very low energy/mass density and this is not only an economic problem, and a thermodynamic problem, but it is also an environmental problem.

The main reason that this problem is missed is that solar energy is a trivial form of energy and has failed to become significant, in spite of 50 years of rote cheering for it.

If it ever gets to the point where it produces 1 or 2 exajoules out of the 500 exajoules humanity now consumes each year, it's external costs will be obviated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I did not say that some weren't better than other, just that all of them have a dirty side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. At least some of this article is disingenuous at best.
For example, growing corn for ethanol is obviously a horrible idea that's been pushed by agrobusiness, and there's no justification for lumping it together with wind turbines and solar cells - unless the author has an agenda.

Notice also that he mentions small scale wind turbines but not large scale wind farms. It seems like the author is picking and choosing his examples to make his point.

Is anybody really surprised that China is environmentally careless? This probably says more about China then it does about solar cells.

The answers seem to be simple enough.
  • Don't use food for fuel.
  • Build large scale wind farms rather than using small scale urban turbines.
  • Have and enforce strong environmental regulations for the production of solar panels (and anything else, for that matter).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. hmmm, if you follow the links from the article....
http://www.bre.co.uk/newsdetails.jsp?id=456

The results show that, in windy locations such as the outskirts of Wick and parts of Portsmouth, domestic micro-wind turbines can generate sufficient energy to pay back their carbon costs within a few months to a few years and then go on to make a positive contribution to combating global warming, but in large, less windy urban areas such as Manchester they are very unlikely to ever pay back their carbon costs. Even when optimally sited outside of major conurbations financial payback is unlikely for all but the most efficient, low maintenance, low price turbines.

well duh, putting a turbine where the wind does not blow will not likely be a wise investment. I would hardly say this means a wind turbine, regardless of size, makes it a "dirty" source of energy. The various ways of creating clean energy are only clean if placed properly.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe we should build these here where we have enviormental laws to regulate this
rather than continue to let our ceo's send this work where there is little or no controls but where they can force people to work for pennies on the dollar all so the ceo's can pocket even more money. The problem lies with the CEO's not with China per sey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. BP just closed a solar manufacturing plant in MD
Moving production to China and India (among others).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. I am so tired of that Washington Post article being used to condemn the entire solar industry
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/08/AR2008030802595.html
...

Because of the environmental hazard, polysilicon companies in the developed world recycle the compound, putting it back into the production process. But the high investment costs and time, not to mention the enormous energy consumption required for heating the substance to more than 1800 degrees Fahrenheit for the recycling, have discouraged many factories in China from doing the same. Like Luoyang Zhonggui, other solar plants in China have not installed technology to prevent pollutants from getting into the environment or have not brought those systems fully online, industry sources say.

"The recycling technology is of course being thought about, but currently it's still not mature," said Shi Jun, a former photovoltaic technology researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Shi, chief executive of Pro-EnerTech, a start-up polysilicon research firm in Shanghai, said that there's such a severe shortage of polysilicon that the government is willing to overlook this issue for now.

"If this happened in the United States, you'd probably be arrested," he said.

...


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=138545&mesg_id=138545
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. Uranium Tillings. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC