|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 03:10 PM Original message |
Just a reminder: Thanks to Ronald Reagan we the taxpayers own commercial spent nuclear fuel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indydem (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. So you want... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 03:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. If they can't be trusted to get rid of it - they shouldn't be allowed to make it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 04:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. It's irresponsible to keep making this stuff and doubly irresponsible to build new reactors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Then I suggest you contact your local politician. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. They should - and if they had, India and Pakistan would never have developed nuclear weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Anti-Iran posts here on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. only racists and rapists oppose nuclear power and nuclear proliferation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. You owe me a keyboard cleanup... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Mission Accomplished |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Protectionism worked out grand for North Korea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. The North Korean Yongbyon plutonium bomb reactor was a nuclear POWER plant - it produced electricity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. No it wasn't. It was a 25MW reasearch reactor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. it was a 5 MW(e) power reactor dear leader - wrong again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. It never produced electrical power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Dear Leader and the IAEA says it was a peaceful(not) 5 MW(e) nuclear POWER plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. No they state it is a research reactor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. No its a 5 MW(e) research reactor - clue: the "e" is for electricity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-10 05:39 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. MIT is WRONG!!! Proliferation has NOTHING to do with nuclear energy!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Of course US, Israel, France, UK, Russia, (and Iran) built nuclear weapons without nuclear power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:12 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. the US nuclear reactor fuel cycle IS the US nuclear weapons complex and the rest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Actually no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. actually yes and you know it - India subverted CANDU and Pakistan used PUREX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Nuclear power does kick ass. Glad you are starting to accept that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-10 04:14 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Yes, kickass nuclear power technology allowed India and Pakistan to develop kickass nuclear weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-10 07:16 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Woohoo ... population reduction WIN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-10 06:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
32. I could support that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good. It's an extremely valuable resource and contains more energy than the toxic solar industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. What horseshit, the only commercial reprocessing plant to operate in the US went fucking bankrupt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Any idea what the "clean up" to nuclear standards of your coal pals processing plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 05:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Deleted message |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 06:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Any idea what the "clean up" to nuclear standards of your coal pals processing plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Oh, there you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. The GOP congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC