Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grass: America’s Largest Irrigated Crop

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:20 AM
Original message
Grass: America’s Largest Irrigated Crop
“Kill Your Lawn,” urges the Sacramento News & Review in a story about cutting residential water use by ripping out turf and putting in climate-appropriate plants. (This call to action sounds familiar: See “A Call for an End to Primpy Lawns.”) With in its fourth year of drought and water supplies getting unsettlingly low, SNR writer Ted Cox asks why on earth property owners should be cultivating water-intensive lawns that go largely unused. The scene he paints could be any number of American cities:

Spend a few minutes cruising the post-5 p.m. streets of just about any Sacramento residential neighborhood—by bicycle or electric vehicle, of course—and you’ll soon notice what’s really funny about the lawns: They’re mostly empty stretches of grass. There are no kids sliding and slipping down Slip ’n Slides; no neighbors chugging beers on front-porch overlooks, arguing about just how bad the Sacramento Kings suck.

When something is happening in the front yard, it almost always has to do with someone pushing a lawn mower or lugging an edge trimmer—or maybe a sprinkler system spraying water on the grass and onto the driveway.

In other words, the only thing going on in most of these large, grassy front yards is the work put into maintaining them.

http://www.utne.com/Wild-Green/Grass-Americas-Largest-Irrigated-Crop.aspx?utm_content=10.26.10+Arts&utm_campaign=Emerging+Ideas-Every+Day&utm_source=iPost&utm_medium=email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. In Milwaukee Co, the water utility has tremendous over capacity
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 11:32 AM by HereSince1628
because residents, and our rusting idled industries, have cut back on water use.

Moreover, sewage and rainwater control is falling apart here to pay for improvements governments have put heavy surcharges and fees onto water bills. The result is very little lawn watering and reliance on precipitation.

The utility is desperate to sell water and will offer discounts for heavy users.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In Victoria, BC
Conservation efforts were so successful, they had to increase the cost of the water to meet the operating expenses of the water system because they weren't selling enough. They also removed the subsidies for low-flow toilets because the program was too successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The law of unintended consequences is very strange
and sometimes surprisingly difficult to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly, it is indeed.
In our town we instituted a pay by the bag trash program in the early 1990's. You had to pay $1 for each specially purchased 39 gallon trash bag, but curbside recycling was free. After about 3 years they had to raise the per bag fee to $1.40, as we were no longer sending enough trash to the incinerator. The Southeaster Connecticut Resource Recovery Agency (a quasi-government entity) that operated the central incinerator raised our per ton tipping fee.

It seems that we had the highest recycling rate per household in Southeastern Connecticut, and had diverted enough of the waste stream to make a sizable impact on the amount of trash we sent to be burned.

Seems we did the job too well, and had to pay the price. The per ton tipping fee was based on a minimum amount a trash per month, set by contract, and we had stopped meeting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't know if grass is the "largest" crop with respect to water use?
The article title sounds like an exaggeration.

Here in Colorado, lawn irrigation accounts for only 5% of total water use. About 5% for other human use: household, industrial, municipal. 90% is used for agriculture. So at least in Colorado, if one completely eliminated lawns the water savings would be only 5%. I believe these percentages are pretty typical of most western states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. California makes up for that

A lot of the area around LA should be desert, but they use so much water that's it's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, THAT kind of grass.
Never mind... :hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Hey, #1 cash crop in Kentucky! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lawns belong on English country manors
Not suburban yards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's the news and review article:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. First you have to actually water your lawn...that is something I never do.
I'm in the very slow process of replacing every freaking blade of grass on my property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Me neither.
Despite the fact that I care for 6 1/2 acres of lawn. Watering the grass is what rain is for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC