Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World's Largest Solar PV Facility Now In Canada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:10 PM
Original message
World's Largest Solar PV Facility Now In Canada
http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/3331

The largest solar photovoltaic (PV) facility in the world was completed last month. This facility is now online and is producing up to 80 megawatts of electricity. But the surprising factor is where this facility is located. It's not in the desert southwest of the United States, nor is it in China nor in Europe. Instead, the Sarnia Solar facility is in Ontario, Canada, across the border from the state of Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's the largest, and only produces 80 megawatts? nt
Edited on Mon Nov-08-10 01:41 PM by Confusious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There are some larger CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) plants in operation
Andasol (Spain), Solnova (Spain), and SEGS (California)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I was more unimpressed by the 80MW number. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not even.
That's 80 MW of capacity. The article specifies an expected production of 120,000 MWh/yr. That translates to an average output of around 14 MW, for a capacity factor of 17%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Woo hoo! We're saved!
And it only cost about 0.4 Billion CA$

http://www.renewablepowernews.com/archives/1005

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's worse than that. The $400 million only bought the 60 MW expansion
The original 20 MW was paid for by the first owner. So that means the last 10.5 MW of production cost us...








Wait for it....








$38 a watt. :banghead:

Tell me again how expensive nuclear power is?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. In my defense, I was extrapolating
the 60MW expansion was $.3B all in, so I took the whole 80MW as .4

so :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. According to the CBC
That $400M CAD was just for the 60 MW expansion.

With the CAD trading at par with the USD, that $38/watt is the same in both currencies.

It's justifiable as a pilot/public relations project, but it's not a serious alternative to coal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. This would be a great time to cut aid to the poor in Canada, close libraries and parks, and
cut back on medical care.

Why can't you be more like us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. boo hoo hoo
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Um...um...um...
We knew already that indifference to poverty as one of the anti-nuke hallmarks.

Yet another QED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Built by Enbridge
Who want to build a pipeline from Alberta to the BC coast to tanker crude to China. The same Enbridge which allowed a million gallons of oil to spill into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan this summer. This project only went ahead because of feed in tariffs that will end up costing the taxpayers a crap load of money down the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. What, no rebuttal citing Greenpeace press releases? nt
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC