Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Entergy Nuclear: the Nuclear Renaissance in Reverse - Greenpeace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:57 PM
Original message
Entergy Nuclear: the Nuclear Renaissance in Reverse - Greenpeace
Entergy Nuclear has had a bad year in Vermont and this past week was no exception.

Within hours of the election of Peter Shumlin as the next Governor of Vermont, Entergy put the aging Vermont Yankee nuclear plant up for sale. According to Entergy, dumping the aged reactor from their books would benefit their stockholders. But Entergy's announcement has everyone wondering, who in their right mind would buy this rust bucket of a reactor?

Just days after the announced sale, Vermont Yankee was forced into an emergency shutdown due to radioactive leaks, this time inside the nuclear plant.

Coincidentally, another of Entergy's troubled old reactors, Indian Point, 24 miles from Manhattan, was also forced to shutdown just minutes earlier because of an explosion and fire.

Ironically, both reactors are in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) license renewal process and claim they can operate for 20 more years. While the twin shutdowns have led to Time Magazine asking if Nuclear power is Really Safe?

Vermonters already know there is nothing "safe" about splitting atoms, especially at Vermont Yankee. They have already rejected Vermont Yankee's Certificate of Public Good and elected the State Senator who championed that vote as their next governor. The most recent radioactive leak should help ward off any potential buyers but don’t expect the NRC’s renewal process to take notice; it wont miss a beat. The NRC has set the bar so low that every reactor that has requested a license renewal has received one. All a reactor owner has to do is to prove it has a program to manage aging and leaking pipes be damned.

Regardless of the NRC's rubber stamped renewals...

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/news-and-blogs/campaign-blog/entergy-nuclear-the-nuclear-renaissance-in-re/blog/28188
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. What, no rebuttal citing Patrick Moore? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC