|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
txlibdem
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 07:45 AM Original message |
Pres. Obama: 80% green energy by 2035, End subsidies to Oil Industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. I am sure that did not sit well with many in Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 08:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Watch Boehner's face when he says that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kennah
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 02:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. His drink was empty, and he was trying to get his server's attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. Attainable? By 2035? seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. I'm just glad that we *finally* have an energy plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Tying it to job creation is also good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Heh, it'd cost 20 trillion dollars if you use Jacobson's scenario. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Are they considering Gen IV reactors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. The problem is that the capital cost of wind when normalized for capacity factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
3. If you include gas and coal as "green" - it becomes an easy goal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 08:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. To be fair he did say "clean coal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
19. And we can interpret that in one of two ways: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 09:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Yup. This morning I saw the Time cover: Obama Loves Reagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
6. Nuclear waste last 30,000 years. It is not green, or unlimited. The uranium will run out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Then we switch to Thorium, we have 1000 years supply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 10:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. If we switch to wind, tidal, wave, solar and hydro, etc., it NEVER runs out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. No wind in space, very little on Mars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, but the material and land requirements for solar and wind is insurmountable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. "Give them food and water and a spartan apartment while they are working on it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 01:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Nuclear "waste" in Gen IV reactors, would be 400 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Actually.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC