A special session bill proposed by Gov. Scott Walker includes many provisions that could hurt Wisconsin's economy and environment, but one of the most perplexing proposals in the package is a new regulation that would effectively ban wind energy projects in Wisconsin.
The regulatory reform bill proposed by Walker would close Wisconsin's doors to clean, renewable wind power and cost our state thousands of jobs. State legislators - who were elected on the promise of job creation and economic recovery - should reject the bill.
The bill creates regulations that effectively prohibit wind energy developers from constructing a wind turbine within 1,800 feet of the nearest property line. If approved, the law will make siting a wind farm so difficult that no wind developer will even bother trying, especially when Illinois and Iowa are waiting with open arms, having no setback provision at all.
The bill will immediately jeopardize 11 proposed wind projects that are set to create hundreds of jobs and undoubtedly many others in the planning stages.
Beyond killing current projects, the law would ensure that no new wind development companies or wind turbine manufacturers locate in Wisconsin and would result in the loss of thousands more jobs constructing and maintaining wind turbines.
Wind energy production is one of the world's fastest-growing industries. In 2010, the industry employed over 85,000 people nationally. In Wisconsin, the wind industry supports thousands of jobs at businesses such as Tower Tech in Manitowoc and Renewegy in Oshkosh. Both companies produce parts for wind turbines. Tower Tech produced its first turbine in 2005 and employs over 250 people at its plant, offering competitive wages and good benefits.
By effectively banning wind energy construction in the state, the law would leave manufacturing companies such as Tower Tech with far less incentive to develop in Wisconsin.
These more restrictive regulations would replace rules that the Wisconsin Public Service Commission recently approved after two years of study, six rounds of public comments and input from all major stakeholder groups.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/114165379.html