Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NRG Will Abandon Twin Texas Nuclear Stations, Take $481 Million Hit - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 12:48 PM
Original message
NRG Will Abandon Twin Texas Nuclear Stations, Take $481 Million Hit - Reuters
NRG Energy Inc said on Tuesday that regulatory uncertainty in the United States in the wake of Japan's Fukushima nuclear accident would force the company to abandon a plan for two additional reactors in Texas and to write off its investment in the project. NRG will record a first-quarter 2011 pretax charge of about $481 million for the impairment of net assets of Nuclear Innovation North America (NINA), its nuclear development joint venture with partner Toshiba American Nuclear Energy Corp (TANE), an affiliate of Toshiba Corp.

Shortly after the March 11 earthquake and tsunami cut off power to the Fukushima station owned by Tokyo Electric Power Co, New Jersey-based NRG cut spending on the $10 billion Texas project and reduced its workforce, citing uncertainty related to a U.S. nuclear industry review and the already deteriorating economics for nuclear power in a low-priced natural gas environment.

"The extraordinary challenges facing U.S. nuclear development in the present circumstance and the very considerable financial resources expended by NRG on the project over the past five years make it impossible for us to justify to our shareholders any further financial participation in the development of the STP project," NRG Chief Executive Officer David Crane said in a statement.

NRG's decision indicates how difficult the Fukushima accident will make it for U.S. companies to participate in the global nuclear revival. The accident is expected to lead to regulatory changes that raise costs for existing reactors and for construction of new ones.

EDIT

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/19/us-nuclear-nrg-idUSTRE73I7E620110419
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yay - they stopped throwing good money after bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. For a while anyway
Just think where we could be energy wise if we'd taken President Carters path he set out for us. Sometimes just thinking about it pisses me off

Whose going to pay to clean up these old nuke plants when they do finally quit using them? You can bet it will be ratepayers and taxpayers and not the owners of the nuke plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yippee, more CO2/fracking
Wonder how many 9.0 earthquakes have hit Texas? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. How many hurricanes have hit Texas?


I share your frustration but lets be realistic. Each potential location for new nuclear power plants has its own unique challenges. Texas is not immune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. One piece of good news. What the frackin' NRC won't do, the market and insurance costs will.
There will be no "global nuclear revival" in America, thank g-d.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And when we get so desperate for energy we start trying to recover all that oil on the Gulf bottom,
So we can burn it? Then what?
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. They would take a worse hit if they didn't cancel them, lots of wind and nat gas in TX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-11 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Dupe (FWIW)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC