Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Impact of Reactor Shutdown: Germany Importing Nuclear Power to Meet Energy Needs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:11 AM
Original message
Impact of Reactor Shutdown: Germany Importing Nuclear Power to Meet Energy Needs
I apologize for the biased source of my other post on this topic. Maybe we can argue substance now, instead of attack the messenger?

Germany has been importing nuclear power from France and the Czech Republic since it switched off its seven oldest nuclear power stations last month in the wake of the Fukushima accident, power company RWE said on Monday.

A spokesman for RWE confirmed a report in Bild newspaper that Germany had become a net importer of power since March 16. Previously, Germany had been a net electricity exporter because of its rising output of power from renewable energy sources.

RWE said the country's power imports from France and Czech have been amounting up to 3,000 megawatts and up to 2,000 megawatts respectively. Three quarters of France's power supply comes from nuclear energy while the Czech Republic relies on reactors for 34 percent of its energy needs.

Hildegard Müller, head of the German Association of Energy and Water Industries also said on Monday that power imports were up. "Since March 17, there has been an increase in imports. Flows from France and the Czech Republic have doubled," she said.


http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,754957,00.html

It's great that Germany wants to focus its efforts on renewables, but ironic that it will still be relying on its detested nuclear power sources in the meantime. Does it really make that much of a difference if the nuclear plants providing Germany power are located in Germany or France?

Sounds more like a N.I.M.B.Y. situation due to all the noisy anti-nuclear activists than any real practical game-changer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. The farther one is from a meltdown, the better
Despite the defensive wailing, this subject *was* actually addressed properly in the other thread.
So poop on your "hate the German greenies" thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Believe it or not, I don't "hate the Greenies."
I think Green Party members have a lot of very good and noble ideas they can bring to the table, its just that they aren't very practical about how they go about trying to bring their hoped for changes about.

Just like Ralph Nader. Very decent consumer rights advocate who has done a lot of good, but his all-or-nothing approach ends up moving us in the wrong direction.

I mean, is it worth it abandoning domestic nuclear power production if it just means building more coal/natural-gas plants and importing more energy from nuclear/coal neighboring countries?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "is it worth it abandoning domestic nuclear power production?"
At the rate at which they units have been failing--Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. You're still using conservative anti-science anti-environmentalist hate speech
when you say things like "all the noisy anti-nuclear activists".
One of the ways of effecting change is to "think globally, act locally" or "be the change you want to see".
So when activists are taking a principled stand and making changes where they live, you shouldn't just explain it away as "nimbyism".

Environmentalists in Germany and France and the world over are trying to reduce fossil and fission energy.
And a lot of that is by acting locally, at the city, county, and state levels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Why do you assume that being pro-nuclear is a conservative position?
France is one of the most liberal countries in the world, and they have embraced it.

The fact that they now get over 70% of their electricity from nuclear sources means that they have done more to fight climate change than any other industrialized country, and are now in the enviable position of not having to build any more coal/nuclear power plants for quite some time, and can instead focus all their efforts on gradual renewables deployment for the foreseeable future.

If only America had been so wise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Only 12% of the French believe in nuclear power as a way to meet their energy needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yet, I bet if you asked those other 88%
If they like having their houses heated, being able to take hot showers, and having their lights coming on when they flick a switch, they wouldn't have it any other way.

Do you really think that most French would prefer burning a bunch of fossil fuels instead?

Like I said before, France is in the enviable position of actually being able to practicably start embracing renewables since it has all that excess capacity from nuclear power generation to rely on while making the switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
13.  PreFukushima only 36% of French thought the benefits of fission were worth the risks
PreFukushima 58% of them thought nuclear fission's risks are underestimated.
In Germany it was only 53%.

PreFukushima 53% of French thought the risks of fission outweigh the benefits.
In Germany it was 52%.

PreFukushima only 36% of French thought the benefits of fission were worth the risks.
In Germany that number was also 36%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That sounds like quite a mood swing.
Too bad so many people are using one freak accident to condemn the entire concept.

I imagine there was a similar reaction when Chernobyl blew up, but after the situation was brought under control and time passed, I imagine support went back up.

You make a good point, kristopher. Maybe we shouldn't be minding the polls too much right now considering Fukushima is still an item, and should wait until the dust settles then see where people stand after they've had a chance to rationally examine the issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You really can't make an honest argument there, can you?
Think anyone wonders why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Pot/kettle rofl n/ t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Any point in challenging you to back that up?
In the past you've just faded away.

Now that I think of it... That's win-win isn't it? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. I am appaulled by the sneering tone towards anti-nuclear sentiments in this forum
DU is a democratic forum and 75% of Dems want to get rid of nuclear plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that the anti-nuclear crowd doesn't have any practical...
...solutions that are economically viable right now?

Just a hunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. What happens when that power is not available during high demand due to needs in the source nation
If Germany goes nuke free, their fraction of domestically produced power would be a record low for a European country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Temporary effects that will be rapidly overcome
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Education is key
Let's get the kiddies off the video games for an hour per night! That will help the US economy long run as well..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. How rapidly?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC