Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reefs recovered faster after (end-Permian) mass extinction than first thought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 09:25 AM
Original message
Reefs recovered faster after (end-Permian) mass extinction than first thought
http://www.mediadesk.uzh.ch/articles/2011/riffe-erholten-sich-nach-massenaussterben-schneller-als-gedacht_en.html
News release, September 30, 2011

Reefs recovered faster after mass extinction than first thought

Metazoan-dominated reefs only took 1.5 million years to recover after the largest species extinction 252 million years ago, an international research team including paleontologists from the University of Zurich has established based on fossils from the southwestern USA.

Harsh living conditions caused by major fluctuations in the carbon content and sea levels, overacidification and oxygen deficiency in the seas triggered the largest mass extinction of all time at the end of the Permian era 252 million years ago. Life on Earth was also anything but easy after the obliteration of over 90 percent of all species: Throughout the entire Early Triassic era, metazoan-dominated reefs were replaced by microbial deposits. Researchers had always assumed it took the Earth as long as five million years to recover from this species collapse. Now, however, an international team, including the paleontologist Hugo Bucher from the University of Zurich and his team of researchers, has proven that reefs already existed again in the southwest of what is now the USA 1.5 million years after the mass extinction. These were dominated by metazoan organisms such as sponges, serpulids and other living creatures, the researchers report in Nature Geoscience.

Growth thanks to new reef-forming metazoan organisms

Metazoan-dominated reefs already developed during the Early Triassic, much earlier than was previously assumed. As soon as the environmental conditions more or less returned to normal, the reef began to grow again due to metazoan organisms that had played a secondary role in reefs up to then. «This shows that, after the extinction of dominant reef creators, metazoan were able to form reef ecosystems much sooner than was previously thought,» says Hugo Bucher, summing up the new discovery.

Literature:

Arnaud Brayard, Emmanuelle Vennin, Nicolas Olivier, Kevin G. Bylund, Jim Jenks, Daniel A. Stephen, Hugo Bucher, Richard Hofmann, Nicolas Goudemand and Gilles Escarguel: Transient metazoan reefs in the aftermath of the end-Permian mass extinction, in: Nature Geoscience, 18 September 2011, DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1264
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Proof again that the human animal is but a speck, a mere mote
in an elephants eye, on the timeline of this planet.

We can not destroy the planet, only ourselves and it's inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Following that logic
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 09:51 AM by OKIsItJustMe
Couldn’t we also conclude that we cannot destroy humanity, only the majority of humanity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Suffering of the poor may have helped societies with class structures spread across the globe…
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 10:10 AM by OKIsItJustMe
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2011/september/feldman-human-migration-092311.html
Stanford Report, September 23, 2011

Suffering of the poor may have helped societies with class structures spread across the globe, say Stanford researchers

Arguably the worst feature of societies with class structures – the disproportionate suffering of the poor – may have been the driving force behind the spread of those stratified societies across the globe at the expense of more egalitarian societies. During hard times, a society in which the bulk of the suffering is borne by the poor can survive and expand into new territory more readily than can egalitarian societies.

BY LOUIS BERGERON

Why do most cultures have a class structure – rich, poor and sometimes middle – instead of being egalitarian, with resources shared equally by everyone?

According to Stanford University researchers, it is the very inequities of the class structure that appear to have been behind the spread of those societies and the displacement of more egalitarian cultures during the early era of human civilization.



In environments where the availability of resources fluctuated from year to year, stratified societies were better able to survive the temporary shortages because the bulk of the deprivation was absorbed by the lower classes, leaving the ruling class – and the overall social structure – intact. That stability enabled them to expand more readily than egalitarian societies, which weren't able to adapt to changing conditions as quickly.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024683


I don’t expect a golden age to result from “Climate Change.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Explains American immigration in a nutshell
If you get a chance, go visit where Grandpa or great-Grandma came from. You will be humbled by their origins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That may well have been true in the past but with an over populated
globe exactly where are we going to expand? And I do not think that Mars is a viable answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh, that’s easy
We won’t be able to expand, and then, when the resources get scarce, we’re left with this:


In environments where the availability of resources fluctuated from year to year, stratified societies were better able to survive the temporary shortages because the bulk of the deprivation was absorbed by the lower classes, leaving the ruling class – and the overall social structure – intact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, that's a relief.
We've got nothing to worry about, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC