Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPS test Hydraulic Hybrid truck expected to achieve 60% - 70% fuel efficiency improvement -urban use

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:18 PM
Original message
UPS test Hydraulic Hybrid truck expected to achieve 60% - 70% fuel efficiency improvement -urban use
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/punishing_success_at_the_epa/">A little known corps of engineers creates environmental innovations on an increasingly dwindling budget.



...This new UPS truck, designed and built by engineers working for the EPA’s Clean Automotive Technology program in Ann Arbor, Michigan, runs on a combination of combustion engine and hydraulic pumps.

The concept is surprisingly simple: When you step on the gas, the diesel engine drives hydraulic pumps that power the wheels and charge hydraulic storage tanks. When you let up on the gas, the engine shuts off completely and the hydraulic chambers engage to power the truck. There is no direct drive shaft from the engine to the wheels. When you brake, the forward momentum of the vehicle is converted to energy that is stored in the high-pressure hydraulic tanks, an efficiency concept reminiscent of hybrid electric cars that charge the car’s battery with the energy created by braking. That process, in (electric) hybrids , can recover about 20% of the car’s moving energy; in the hydraulic truck, an astounding 70% of the energy is recovered. For the stop/start use common to most UPS trucks, that translates to a 60% to 70% increase in fuel efficiency.



http://files.harc.edu/Projects/Transportation/HydraulicHybridsGray.pdf">hydraulic Hybrids - EPA presentation


Unfortunately, in the present Demolish Government climate this programs has been fighting for funding. By now it may have been cut so much as to be virtually dead.




Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. 2 to 3 yr payback!! That's what businesses will see! And little to no exotic materials needed.
very good news. I hope Obama doesn't give in to GOP efforts to kill off our future by defunding important programs which help industry explore new techologies and thereby accelerate their adoption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only negative thing I can think of is the noise
Hydraulic motors tend to be very noisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Driving around the assembled crowd, the hydraulic-powered UPS truck was as quiet as a golf cart"
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/punishing_success_at_the_epa/">"Driving around the assembled crowd, the hydraulic-powered UPS truck was as quiet as a golf cart"



http://articles.cnn.com/2008-10-28/tech/ups.hybrid.trucks_1_hybrid-trucks-hydraulic-hybrid-hydraulic-fluid?_s=PM:TECH

"At first the drivers thought the engine had stalled. It's so much quieter," said James Bryson, an EPA mechanical engineer who helped develop the hydraulic hybrid system at the agency's National Vehicle & Fuel Emissions Laboratory. "After they got used to it, they really liked it."


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't buy it. Not the 20%, nor the complexity of the hydraulics.
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 04:23 PM by Gregorian
Nor the percent impact on the planet, given the small number of vehicles.

That 20% figure doesn't represent regenerative braking gains from an electric vehicle. Someone show me where I'm wrong about this.

More claptrap to hang on an already polished turd is not the way forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC