Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Danger of tritium exposure underrated, report says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 07:51 PM
Original message
Danger of tritium exposure underrated, report says
Danger of tritium exposure underrated, report says
MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT, Globe and Mail - Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Releases of radioactive tritium from Canadian nuclear power plants are so elevated that children under 4 and pregnant women shouldn’t live within 10 kilometres of an atomic generating station, and those living within five kilometres shouldn’t eat food grown in their gardens, Greenpeace says in a controversial study being released Tuesday.

Canadian-style Candu reactors are among the world’s largest sources of tritium, producing up to hundreds of times more of the radioactive substance than other reactor designs. The report says high amounts of tritium in the Great Lakes and around the stations indicate nuclear plants routinely emit it into the environment.

The Greenpeace report calls Health Canada’s standard for the level of tritium in drinking water “very lax” because it is about 10 times higher than that of the United States and 100 times higher than the level allowed in Europe.

“Scientific concerns about tritium’s hazards are inadequately recognized by Canada’s nuclear regulators,” the study contends.

But federal regulators ...

http://ottawariverkeeper.ca/news/danger_of_tritium_exposure_underrated_report_says/

Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. and this is the world's safest nuclear reactor.
all others are worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not in terms of tritium release.
By that standard it's probably the worst.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. More than four years old.

Of course the "report" was easily debunked.

http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/ReviewofGreenpeacereport_Final.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC