Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yokohama finds high strontium-90 levels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:47 AM
Original message
Yokohama finds high strontium-90 levels
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20111013a3.html

YOKOHAMA — Radioactive strontium exceeding normal levels has been detected in sediment from atop an apartment building in Yokohama, some 250 km from the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, city officials said Wednesday.

While the discovery of 195 becquerels of strontium-90 in the rooftop sediment fueled concerns that leaked radiation may have spread farther than the central government expected, the officials said the city is carefully examining where the isotope came from.

If the substance is from the Fukushima plant, it will be the first time strontium at a concentration of more than 100 becquerels per kilogram has been found beyond 100 km from the troubled plant.

The strontium-90 was detected by a private agency that conducted the test at the request of a resident.
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why was there ever an assumption that the radiation wouldn't spread
and continue to be dangerous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Who ever said that it wouldn't spread?
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 11:55 AM by FBaggins
Not that this is an example of spreading... in fact it's just the opposite (concentrating).

As for "continue to be dangerous"... wouldn't the levels in the area have to get UP to "dangerous" before they can continue to be dangerous?

100 Bq/kg is not a level for concern. You face levels like that all the time.

And the article doesn't even say how much of the stuff there was. Is there even a single kilogram?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's South West of Fukushima! And Strontium 90 is a bone-seeker.
Bone cancer.

Still buying food imported from Japan? Why?

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The amount actually matters.
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 12:21 PM by FBaggins
And Strontium 90 is a bone-seeker

Which makes it more dangerous than comparable activity from other sources, but there still has to be enough of it to matter.

Strontium 90 is a beta emitter - which is therefore more dangerous as an internal emitter than something outside of your body. You would obviously like to limit that internal exposure.

If you're a human male that weighs about 200 pounds, then you have roughly 22 milligrams of Potassium 40 and 29 nanograms of Carbon 14 in your body all day long. Both are beta emitters. Together they account for roughly 10,500 Bq of internal beta emissions on an ongoing basis.

Are you really concerned about eating enough muck from a ceiling drain at 45 Bq per pound to impact that 10,500?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC