Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama WH Critical Of Ban On Regulating Coal Ash, But Won't Threaten Veto

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:14 PM
Original message
Obama WH Critical Of Ban On Regulating Coal Ash, But Won't Threaten Veto
The White House blasted House Republican legislation that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from imposing stringent regulations on harmful waste produced by coal plants.

But the White House, in a formal statement of administration policy, did not threaten to veto the legislation, known as the “Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act.”

The legislation, sponsored by Rep. David McKinley (R-W.Va.), would prevent EPA from regulating coal ash, the byproduct of coal plants. The bill would instead leave the issue largely up to the states. E2 has more on the bill, which is slated to come up on the House floor this week, here.

The White House said Wednesday that the bill is “insufficient to address the risks associated with coal ash disposal and management, and undermines the Federal government’s ability to ensure that requirements for management and disposal of coal combustion residuals are protective of human health and the environment.”

EDIT

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/187037-white-house-blasts-bill-to-override-epa-coal-ash-rules-falls-short-of-veto-threat
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'll say the right thing but not do anything about it?
Tell me it isn't so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. So not so much "won't threaten a veto" as "hasn't threatened a veto yet."
Probably because it's odds of getting through the Senate are slim to none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Gosh ... more lip service when it opposes the paymasters ...
Quelle surprise.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC