Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Chief Justice Already Testing Environmental Law's Pillars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:27 PM
Original message
A Chief Justice Already Testing Environmental Law's Pillars
<snip> On federal power, Judge Roberts's most noteworthy opinion, in a 2003 Endangered Species Act dispute over the "hapless toad that, for reasons of its own, lives its entire life in California," suggests he may be skeptical about the act's nationwide reach. Scarier still, his apparent view is shared by several other judges on the administration's short list, all of whom have expressed it in more strident language.

On the federal-state balance, Roberts helped the State of Alaska challenge U.S. EPA's decision to veto a state-issued air pollution permit. To Roberts's client, the federal action was "second-guessing" a state prerogative, but to EPA (and other states that supported EPA) it was an unremarkable exercise of oversight, authorized by the Clean Air Act. Justice O'Connor's vote created a bare 5-4 majority in favor of federal authority. Environmentalists worry whether future justices will hew closer to O'Connor, or tip the balance to the dissenters.

On state innovation, states' attempts to go beyond federal minimum standards often get preempted in court. Roberts recently was part of an appellate panel that voided the District of Columbia's ban on hazardous rail shipments, citing conflicts with federal railroad law. In contrast, the trial judge had found that D.C.'s goals of public safety and environmental protection merely complemented the federal regime. Reasonable minds differ on this issue, but an overly broad view of federal preemption would hamper other state environmental initiatives, including recent efforts to limit greenhouse gases.

On citizen enforcement, Roberts has argued for a restrictive theory of citizen suits that is closely associated with Justice Scalia, questioning whether courts may "exercise such oversight responsibility at the behest of any John Q. Public who happens to be interested in the issue." As with the hapless toad, environmentalists fear that Roberts's glib tone betrays insensitivity to the long-term ecological and intergenerational interests that arise in environmental cases. <snip>

http://newswire.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/behold.pl?ascribeid=20050920.090411&time=09%2056%20PDT&year=2005&public=0

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unschooler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. A very limited view of federal power just doesn't work to protect
the environment. Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment to get around Commerce Clause issues, but the feds MUST be able to protect the environment, regardless of the habitat range of the toad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The same people who loudly profess "a very limited view" of Federal ..
.. power when it comes to protecting the environment or the poor, seem to have no problem whatsoever trying to use Federal authority to shut down a vote recount in Florida or to ask Congress to intervene in a one specific medical decision made by one specific husband with respect to his long brain-dead wife.

They believe in "original intent" when it serves their needs; but when they want to push the "American as a Christian nation" theme, they'll conveniently overlook the unanimous passage of the Treaty of Tripoli very early in the Republic's history.

There's no reason whatsoever to believe that any of the high-falutin' noise these folk make about "principles" is anything but insincere propaganda for partisan gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unschooler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bingo! You are right on all points!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was Roberts even *asked* about environmental protection issues...
...in the confirmation questioning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. not that I've heard
Roberts is the nominee of the business wing of the rethugs, the concentration of attention has been on social issues, a masterful bit of misdirection IMHO. He will rule consistantly for business against the environment, regulation and labor. The next nominee will be from the christofascist wing.

If Pombo doesn't kill the ESA Roberts will. Your avatar will be in demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What a ruse
They sold Roberts on those "morals" issues. Once placed, he is going to take away the consumer and health protections away from the very people who put him in power...

There's wooden shoes, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC