Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Solargenix Energy Secures Approvals for 64MW Solar (Nevada)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 AM
Original message
Solargenix Energy Secures Approvals for 64MW Solar (Nevada)
http://www.solarbuzz.com/News/NewsNAPR552.htm

Solargenix Energy has secured the approval of amendments to their Power Purchase Agreements with Nevada Power Company and Sierra Pacific Power Company by the Public Utility Commission of Nevada. This approval by the PUCN will allow Solargenix to complete the development of Nevada Solar One, a 64-megawatt (MW) Solar Thermal Electric Generating Plant located in Boulder City, Nevada.

Solargenix Energy says that Nevada Solar One will will be the third largest solar thermal electric power plant in the world. This project will make Nevada one of the largest generators of solar energy in the U. S.

<snip>

According to published information from the U. S. Department of Energy through the U.S. National Laboratories, which is available on the Solargenix website, the parabolic trough technology utilized in this plant represents one of the major renewable energy success stories of the past 2 decades and has a near-term potential to compete directly with conventional fossil fuel powered technologies.

In addition, the DOE has issued a report that identifies suitable land and solar resources in Nevada that could produce over 600,000 megawatts (MW) of power generation using concentrating solar technologies. Currently, Nevada’s electricity consumption is less than 3% of this resource capacity. This same report claims that the economic benefits far exceed the cost to develop this clean renewable energy source. The Boulder City plant located in the El Dorado Valley is scheduled to begin production of electricity in early 2007.

<more>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Troughs are neat.

Simpler to fabricate than a dish, and only have to be tracked along the slow axis, because the fast-axis offset only affects the delivery of light to the edges. Very efficient design.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's the DOE site for these projects:
http://www.eere.energy.gov/solar/csp.html



I've been out to the solar trough plant at Kramer Junction and it's impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. When Luz went bankrupt building these in 1991, natural gas was cheaper.
It's worth noting that Luz went bankrupt building the plants, but the nine plants they built are all still operating. These are plants with high capital costs, but they probably run for quite some time - assuming decent maintenance - afterward in a cost effective manner.

I recall the matter very well, since I lived in San Diego at the time. There was a lot of hope invested as well as money.

These plants, though, are nowhere near as dithering as PV plants - this is actually serious stuff particularly since the systems are adaptable to provide process heat.

Most of them were actually hybrid plants, solar during date light hours and natural gas plants at night. This, of course, reduced the fixed cost problems (low capacity loading) that dog many renewable systems.

The new "hybrid" technology involves, predictably, coal:

http://www.eere.energy.gov/consumerinfo/pdfs/solar_trough.pdf

One drawback is that these plants require water to run at maximum efficiency; however the place where there is the most sun are precisely the places where there is the least water.

However there are places that one could imagine an ideal mix of conditions. The area around the Salton Sea in California comes to mind. The Salton Sea is a man made feature, formed during a disaster that occurred during an attempt to divert the Colorado River in 1905 and maintained since then by agricultural run-off water from the Imperial Valley. One imagines that these types of plants could theoretically be used to generate peak electricity for California and to recover, via desalination, some of the water in the Salton Sea, at least as long as the Sea exists. (Someday the water wars in the Southwest will doom the Sea - all of the water will end up in toilets in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Las Vegas.) Presumably it would also be possible to recover salts, and maybe some of the selenium that pervades the area.

One could also use process heat from solar trough technology for the recovery of biodiesel starting materials from locally grown algae. The agriculturally polluted water in the area should be ideal for that sort of thing.

This certainly isn't a magical solution, or necessarily a scalable solution - but it's one that conceivably on a niche basis makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. niche
It seems to me, once we fill all the 'niches', we'll have a very large part of our problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC