Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China's Three Gorges hits full capacity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 11:05 AM
Original message
China's Three Gorges hits full capacity
YICHANG, Oct. 30 (Xinhua) -- China's Three Gorges Dam on Sunday reached its designed highest mark, the second time for the world's largest water control and hydropower project to run at full capacity.

The water level hit 175 meters at 5 p.m. after storing water for nearly two months from the water level of 152 meters, said an official with the China Three Gorges Project Corporation (CTGPC), the developer of the project.

A dozen hydropower turbo-generator units started operation on Sunday, generating power capacity of 8.2 million kw, said the official.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-10/30/c_131220655.htm
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. "generating power capacity of 8.2 million kw"
Is that rated as continuous output? Not per hour, right? Pretty impressive number...almost a billion watts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That'd be *8.2* Billion Watts (gigawatts)
The output of, say, 4 to 8 nukes.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Whoopsie...yeah, I was only off by a factor of 10.
A small miscalculation. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You don't know the half of it.
Literally.

That's the capacity of the twelve units they mention. The facility has 29 such generators (and a couple smaller ones)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Watts continuous are the same as watts per hour.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 12:03 PM by TheWraith
One kilowatt-hour is the same as one thousand watts, continuously for an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Watts multiplied by hours, not watts divided by hours
Power multiplied by time is a unit of energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Grand Coulee project in Washington is 6.809 Megawatts, very comparable
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Is it? This is 8.2 billion watts, Grand Coulee is 6.809 million watts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Once again... Three Gorges' peak capacity is 22.5 billion watts
Grand Coulee is 6.809 million watts?

No. 6.8 million kilowatts (or Billion watts).

So it's "comparable" to the extent that "1/3 as much" is a comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. OK...but just referencing to the OP's mention of 8.2mm kilowatts vs. what
the poster noted as being comparable (6.8MM watts). I'll take your word that Three Gorge's has max generating capabilities of 22.5BB watts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm pretty sure the period was a typo
the wiki reference he gave presented thousands of MW

the comma and period are right next to each other on the keyboard.

Your point was clear, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That makes sense..
didn't look at the source info, but I comma would have made his point correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC