Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teabagger Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) pitches bill to end energy subsidies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:48 AM
Original message
Teabagger Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) pitches bill to end energy subsidies
BOISE, Idaho — Idaho Congressman Raul Labrador says it's time for the federal government to get out of the business of subsidizing energy projects.

The Republican announced Thursday he is co-sponsoring legislation that would get rid of all energy subsidy programs, including tax incentives for renewable projects.

Labrador says instead of tapping taxpayers to subsidy dollars, he would rather let the free market determine and guide the nation's energy development.

The measure calls for eliminating $90 million in energy tax subsidies over the next 10 years and reduce the corporate tax rate by the same amount.

The bill also has the backing of groups like Americans for Tax Reform and Americans for Prosperity, which is backed by oil billionaire David Koch and lobbies for lower taxes and less government regulation.


http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/11/04/1865364/labrador-pitches-bill-to-end-energy.html

Yeah, I'm sure David Koch is really bothered by the "huge tax burden" that $90 million (drop in the bucket) represents.

It's not like renewable energy subsidies threaten his oil interests or anything... NAH, of course not...

:grr:
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. "free market" What "free market?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sure as long as we can get rid of ALL oil subsidies.
What is there 4 Billion annually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah, but then we would not get renewables. oil would continue its stanglehold on us. eom
Edited on Fri Nov-04-11 10:24 AM by ellenfl
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC