Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fracking Linked To Earthquakes In The U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
GoLeft TV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:53 AM
Original message
Fracking Linked To Earthquakes In The U.S.
On the heels of yesterday’s report detailing Cuadrilla Resource’s admission that their fracking practices were responsible for small earthquakes in the U.K., new reports are surfacing that link fracking to earthquakes that occurred in January in Oklahoma. According to a new study by the Oklahoma Geological Survey , fracking is linked to 50 mini-earthquakes that occurred on January 18, 2011 in Oklahoma.

The NRDC describes the events as follows:

The occurrence of so-called “induced seismicity” – seismic activity caused by human actions – in conjunction with fluid injection or extraction operations is a well-documented phenomenon. However, induced earthquakes large enough to be felt at the surface have typically been associated with large scale injection or withdrawal of fluids, such as water injection wells, geothermal energy production, and oil and gas production. It was generally thought that the risk of inducing large earthquakes through hydraulic fracturing was very low, because of the comparatively small volumes of fluid injected and relatively short time-frame over which it occurs. As the controversy over hydraulic fracturing has heated up, however, researchers and the public have become increasingly interested in the potential for fracking to cause large earthquakes.

Full story at DeSmogBlog - http://www.desmogblog.com/fracking-linked-earthquakes-u-s
Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. So the Haliburton Earthquake Generator isn't just tinfoil hat stuff after all
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
StandingInLeftField Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pissed cat looks pissed
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, considering the fine print that these are microquakes.
The energy of cracking apart rock formations, even under intense pressure, is still microscopic compared to a really big quake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I believe that quakes triggered by human activity release energy that was already accumulated...
...and was destined to be released in one or more earthquakes in the future.

The fracking doesn't cause earthquakes, it just changes their timing and magnitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Can you cite the scientific data that proves that?
I haven't heard anyone who would speak on that, from a government agency like the National Geological Society or any other university etc address the issue in that manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I haven't seen any scientific data to suggest that the fracking activity magically creates strain
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes... But "the future" could be hundreds/thousands of years away.
Even if an activity only advances a future event, the results are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'd love to see slackmaster's theory hold up in court -
Edited on Sat Nov-05-11 03:59 PM by truedelphi
Lately spouse and I are perplexed and angry at a neighbor... What to do?

So using slackmaster's argument, I guess we could wait till said neighbor goes on a trip, take out a jack hammer, demolish his driveway, and then point out to the judge hearing our case that sooner or later, the dormant volcano in our area would be re-awakened, and his driveway would have fallen apart then anyway.

And at least our jackhammer activity wouldn't be disrupting the entire water supply for the OCunty, unlike the fracking activity that uses millions of gallons of water, and allows for seepage of frack material into the local aquifers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's a piss-poor analogy. The jackhammer introduces energy into the system.
Specifically the energy that causes the destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. WHY can't we use a MODERN for of extraction. i mean,
can't they come up w/ a fucking straw system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. A "straw" is what they used to use. Fracking is the more modern method. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC