Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tiny Alaskan village sues energy companies for conspiring

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 02:30 PM
Original message
Tiny Alaskan village sues energy companies for conspiring
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 02:34 PM by Blue_In_AK
to cover up evidence of climate change.

From The Alaska Dispatch: http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/alaska-village-alleges-climate-change-cover-exxon-other-energy-companies



The battle between some of the world's most powerful energy companies and an Alaska village that's losing ground to climate change heads to federal appeals court on Monday.

Nine Kivalina residents, having survived the recent mega-storm that walloped western Alaska, will be at the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco to watch their lawyers argue that ExxonMobil Corp., BP, ConocoPhillips and other corporate Goliaths owe the village at least $95 million in damages.

A key Kivalina argument charges that the energy companies are engaged in a conspiracy to cover up the link between their emissions and the earth's warming temperatures. A similar argument proved pivotal decades ago in helping smokers prevail in court against tobacco giants.

The Northwest Alaska village lost the first round of its lawsuit in 2009, when a U.S. District Court dismissed it, saying climate-change pollution needs to be regulated by Congress and the administration, not courts. The village lacked standing, the court said, because it could not show the companies' emissions caused the erosion threatening the village.

But Kivalina is optimistic this time around.

<snip>




Lest anyone blame the village for building here, it was a forced move by the federal government decades ago. Couldn't have those Natives living a traditional nomadic lifestyle out there. People needed a "permanent" residence, and this is what they were given.
http://www.nana.com/regional/about-us/overview-of-region/kivalina/



Refresh | +19 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you!
This will be a very interesting test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think this paragraph at the second link
is very relevant. Even if the oil companies are exonerated in this, it would seem that the US government or SOMEBODY should pick up the tab for the move.



Kivalina was relocated to its current location in 1905 when the Bureau of Indian Affairs repeated the error of the Russian naval officer by mistaking a seasonal camp on the barrier reef for a year-round village. The BIA in short order built a school on the southern tip of the island and declared that any inhabitants of the barrier reef and surrounding region who did not enroll their children would be imprisoned. This order compelled the people of the original Kivalina as well as communities inland and north and south along the coast to migrate to the Kivalina created by the BIA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC