Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forest Service To Triple Sierra Nevada Logging - LA Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:15 AM
Original message
Forest Service To Triple Sierra Nevada Logging - LA Times
"The U.S. Forest Service announced Thursday that it would triple logging in the Sierra Nevada to levels not seen in a decade as part of a fire prevention strategy that casts aside Clinton-era restrictions on timber cutting. Regional Forester Jack Blackwell, who presented the plan in Sacramento on Thursday, said the changes were necessary to step up forest thinning that would lessen the threat of forest fires. "If we don't take those actions, we're going to burn 'em up. It's as simple as that."

Under the new plan, logging levels will climb in the Sierra to 330 million board-feet of green timber a year, roughly three times what is now allowed. However, that is still less than half the amount cut during the peak years of commercial logging in the range in the late 1980s.

EDIT

The latest plan officially drops many of those restrictions, permitting not only the removal of far more trees but cutting ones as large as 30 inches in diameter in old-growth stands. It also loosens habitat protections for rare species such as the California spotted owl, Yosemite toad, Pacific fisher and willow flycatcher.

EDIT

Others noted the Forest Service had retreated from promises that 75% of the logging would occur near communities vulnerable to wildfires. In its final form, the plan lowers that figure to 50%.

EDIT

First outlined in detail last year, the new Sierra blueprint has been controversial within the Forest Service as well as outside. In internal reviews, Forest Service biologists and other government scientists said they were aware of no scientific justification for weakening the Clinton-era standards and warned that increased logging could harm declining wildlife species."

EDIT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Imperial Amerika will be a barren, pulluted place
I don't envy those who will be living in the Empire in 2050...and 2100?

I shudder to think of the environmental, social, and political condition of that sad Third World Nation of the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC