and their propensity to explode, that's be greatly appreciated!
my search pulled up a few sites that mostly discussed them in a positive light, i.e., as a source of energy:
http://www.fe.doe.gov/oil_gas/methanehydrates/as far as the cryogenic tanker goes . . . are you sure they didn't build any, isn't that what the following paragraph is referring to (or are you thinking of something else?)
http://www.naturalgasfacts.org/factsheets/liquefied.htmlGovernment and industry leaders concerned about the need for more natural gas are increasingly interested in imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a way to help meet rising demand.
Gas is chilled to minus 260 degrees Fahrenheit, turning it to liquid. In its liquid form, the gas takes up one six hundredth the space occupied by an equivalent amount of vapor, a little like reducing a car to the size of your fist.
The liquid is pumped onto an LNG tanker for ocean shipment to the U.S. where it is returned to vapor and sent under pressure through pipelines for use in home heating and cooling, or in factories or producing electricity. All of the gas consumed in Japan comes from LNG imports. In the U.S., just 1 percent of the gas consumed by residents is imported LNG. By 2008, that number is expected to grow to 3 percent, according to the Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). At the moment, there are just four U.S. facilities equipped to take LNG ashore: in Everett, Mass; Cove Point, Md.; Elba Island, Ga.; and Lake Charles, La.
pictures of lng carriers can be found at this link:
http://www.pacific-war.com/nauticus/mybio2.html