As we know, the anti-nuclear industry is performing poorly lately, and many units (notably the
exajoule) are deeply troubling to it.
A recent number of public failures in the last year, such as the decision in Canada to refurbish the Point Lepreau nuclear station, the start up of five new reactors in Japan, new capacity that easily outstrips the new world capacity for renewable energy
worldwide and the inadvertent release of 7 or 8 billion tons of carbon dioxide, the filing of 13 COLs for new US nuclear stations, and the continued rise in nuclear power production, have led many to predict that the anti-nuclear industry cannot sustain itself.
Defenders of the anti-nuclear industry point out that the loss of life and property has been limited to the destruction of a relatively small (if famous) city in the US, and several unimportant countries on the Iberian peninsula, oh, and major droughts in several unimportant African countries, oh yeah and the melting of major glaciers worldwide, and, I almost forgot, the melting of the permafrost worldwide, but little else, unless one counts the desertification creeping across China, the bark beetles eating dessicated forests, the fires in Texas, and the unprecedented number of powerful hurricanes that everybody should forget about since wind is good for wind farms.
In spite of these relatively minor setbacks, the anti-nuclear industry is confident that it can revive its moribund fortunes, although many members concede that the usual arguments are in need of refurbishment. The arguments of the last 50 years including nuclear waste is the only form of energy waste that counts, that mining deaths only count if they're in uranium mines and that solar PV power, wind power and (my personal favorite) tidal power
really are going pan out this time and that they were only kidding for the last 50 years, and terrorism, terrorism, Saddam Hussein and saying "nuclear weapons" as often as possible are still leaky arguments of course, but the anti-nuclear movement is confident that the leaks can be stemmed by piling the words "megawatts by 2050," "Chernobyl," and "Three Mile Island" after saying 5 "Hail Marys," 6 "Our Fathers" and 8 rosaries.
While critics point out that the anti-nuclear industry still has no approved repository for its spent promises, nor is any such repository likely to be approved, and while no new nuclear construction plan or license extension has been stopped for almost 20 years, the anti-nuclear industry is confident, even if global climate change gets out of control (and it
could you know), the climate (if you don't look at the thermometer) is ripe for the construction of many new websites that all reference each other about why nuclear power sucks.
Here is a report from the Canadian Anti-nuclear industry recently stung by the Canadian decision to bring Bruce 3 back on line in 2003, the restart of Bruce 4 in 2004 and the recent (2005) decision to refurbish Point Lepreau and bring it back on line in 2008:
TORONTO – In an unexpected move, the anti-nuclear industry has announced a decision to undergo major refurbishment. The decision follows a lengthy review of the future need for anti-nuclear power in Canada, and the status of energy contrariness in general.
Some anti-nuclear groups have now been operating for 30 years and longer, despite being designed initially for 20-years' usefulness.
"Our whole basis was generational," says Normally Rude, co-founder of the Toronto-based watchdog group Everything is a Problem, "It's sort of a zeitgeist thing. We never intended to be around 30 years later, still saying the same old stuff."
The situation came to a head with the recent decision to refurbish the Pt. Lepreau nuclear station in New Brunswick.
"There's a case where due process was followed to the extreme," says Rude, "They looked at all the options, and still came out in favor of refurbishment. I mean, what could we do? We had nothing."
A news release from Everything is a Problem, shortly after the Pt. Lepreau announcement, attempted to denounce the decision.
"It was ridiculous. We pulled out all the old chestnuts. We even dissed the MAPLE project, for crying out loud. We had nothing relevant to say."
http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/refurbish.htmWhile many people think that the anti-nuclear industry should be left for dead, clearly it intends to press on, providing lots of wind and huge piles of leaflets.