Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nuclear clean-up costs billions more (UK)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:36 PM
Original message
Nuclear clean-up costs billions more (UK)
Mar 31 2006
Daily Post

THE decommissioning clean-up costs of Britain's nuclear power sites have escalated from £44bn to £56bn, it was disclosed yesterday.

The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) said a new estimate, however, would push the costs of cleaning and operating its 20 sites to £70bn.

That figure includes an operating cost of £14bn, according to a spokesman ...

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=ISO-8859-1&ncl=http://www.greenconsumerguide.com/index.php%3Fnews%3D3054


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry too much about a possible nuclear accident such
as happened in Chernobyl. It only takes about 250,000 years for the radioactivity to drop to non-lethal levels. (sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't worry too much about the REAL ocean acidification
due to increased atmospheric carbon levels that happen when people burn stuff to make energy, waiting for perfection in the for of teensy weensy amounts of solar and wind power.

Or, we could build new nuke plants and require them to post GBP100bn worth of bonds, which would raise their per kWh cost by a fraction of a cent. (pence?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually we shouldn't worry about too many Chernobyls
Very few RBMK reactors still operate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC