Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA proposes weaker water-quality rule (just a little arsenic!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:59 AM
Original message
EPA proposes weaker water-quality rule (just a little arsenic!)
I live in none of these little rural towns that will probably be allowed to finally admit we have arsenic in our water in Nevada! Ha!

WASHINGTON -- The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to allow higher levels of contaminants such as arsenic in the drinking water used by small rural communities, in response to concerns that they cannot afford to comply with recently imposed limits.

The proposal would roll back a rule that went into effect earlier this year and make it permissible for water systems serving 10,000 or fewer residents to have three times the level of contaminants allowed under that regulation.

About 50 million people live in communities that would be affected by the proposed change. In the case of arsenic, the most recent EPA data suggest that as many as 10 million Americans are drinking water that does not meet the new federal standards.

Benjamin Grumbles, assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Water, said the agency was trying to satisfy Congress, which instructed EPA in 1996 to take into account the fact that it costs small rural towns more to meet federal drinking water standards.

more...

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/04/02/epa_proposes_weaker_water_quality_rule/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
"permissible for water systems serving 10,000 or fewer residents to have three times the level of contaminants allowed"

A new definition of "Fucked up".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Money rules
Rural people allowed to be poisoned. No biggy by the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ...damn, you hit that on the head alright! We live in a gold mining town
...and we have to ingest our arsenic to make sure foreign mining companies stay profitable while mining on our public lands!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Look on the bright side...
You've got a relatively thin chance of dying from lung cancer... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. this should be a state issue, EPA needs to butt out . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. IOW--- If you don't have the money to meet the rules...
we're not going to give you the money-- just let you die.

At least you know the rules, and why you're dying. We give you that much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Isn't the EPA supposed to...
um, protect people?

Arsenic is a deadly...oh, forget it.

Can we just charge the administration with attempted murder of everyone in the state, and get it over with?

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. supposed to... doing so, two different things
we need to get rid of the Keystone Cops.
this is better handled by the states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC