Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huge KY Coal Power Plant Not Subject To Major Pollution Reduction Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:19 PM
Original message
Huge KY Coal Power Plant Not Subject To Major Pollution Reduction Rules
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 12:45 PM by hatrack
Kentucky's chief environmental official has rejected recommendations that would greatly reduce pollution from a large coal-burning power plant proposed for Muhlenberg County — instead opting for just two changes. Environmentalists who had hoped to make Peabody Energy's Thoroughbred power plant a national model for cleaner-coal technology must now decide whether to go to court to fight Environment and Public Protection Cabinet Secretary LaJuana S. Wilcher's decision.

Last year, a state hearing officer in the environmental cabinet had recommended that the Kentucky Division for Air Quality consider sweeping revisions in the state's air-quality permit for the plant after a court-like hearing, including 70 days of testimony by various environmental experts and state officials. "Politics has trumped, at least at this stage, the analysis of an independent fact-finder," said attorney Hank Graddy of Midway, who frequently handles Sierra Club legal issues in Kentucky. "I read this opinion as saying big business, or the biggest business, is more important than public health."

EDIT

In an order posted on the cabinet Web site, Wilcher told state regulators to update the permit so that it complies with newer federal requirements that will cut toxic mercury emissions by a third. She also set a somewhat tighter cap on emissions of nitrogen oxides, which contribute to smog. Wilcher declined to be interviewed, but as a result of her ruling, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality will not have to evaluate whether cleaner-burning but more expensive coal technologies should be required at Thoroughbred. She determined that such technology was too preliminary when the permit was issued in 2002.

It also means Peabody won't have to wash its coal before burning to help reduce air pollution because of concerns that it would create unmanageable "gob piles" of coal waste. No additional studies will be required to determine the plant's effect on the environment.

EDIT

http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060413/NEWS01/604130385
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why am I not surprised, at all, by this?
Wanker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC