|
of any plan to shift away from Oil... since we simply have no comparable source of energy--even with alternate sources and technologies.
In one sense, ideally, scientists would simply discover a clean, non-polluting, eco-friendly, simple, safe, inexpensive and unlimited/inexhaustible new source of energy. Then even the poorest people on the planet could have gigantic SUVs, air-conditioning and 200+ Satellite TV channels. :woohoo:
In another, ideally, we'd all cut back; live simpler lives and be more in accord with the environment/nature...
Yet, the harsh truth is... If we want to keep our planet healthy--including nature... we need a drastic reduction in our current energy usage. Not just for the obvious environmental reasons either, but for the fact that having such abundant energy has allow the human population to grow out of control--to levels far beyond what the environment and nature can support-while-simultaneously-providing for wildlife (non-human/non-domesticated plants/animals of all types and varieties). We might be able to keep that many humans alive and even comfortable while cutting back enough not to destroy the entire planet--but even our current population levels--heck, even a couple of billion fewer of us--means increased or, at least continued exploitation and destruction of habitat (even assuming we find more eco-friendly technologies and lifestyles). If we want the rest of the life on Earth to live and thrive; we need to at least develope eco-sustainable lifestyles and energy usage, but a real reduction in population would be best for all (though it would mean fewer children over several generations to produce the reduction--or something catastrophic such as a killer avian-flu pandemic (ouch; rapid population reduction would hurt)).
As usual, though, for most people the world over, if they themselves (and immediate families) have enough--have the lifestyles they've either come to take for granted or the lifestyles they've come to dream of (having seen how the other half lives), then they simply don't care enough to worry about the environment or the rest of nature. The environmentally responsible really are a minority; and I don't see how the kind of lifestyle changes that would be required--as a minimum--would ever be accepted by the selfish majority. I feel, somehow it's possible--but I don't have a clue how. Especially since almost everyone would have to agree to give up their luxuries--at the same time; nobody** wants to feel like they're giving up more than others.
Welcome to the human race; the illusion of civilization where really, everyone's** in it for themselves. Oh... I'm just jaded. Nevermind.
**again, not everyone, but the majority anyway.
|