Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Romney Will Not Rejoin NE States' Greenhouse Agreement - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 12:11 PM
Original message
Romney Will Not Rejoin NE States' Greenhouse Agreement - Reuters
NEW YORK - Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney will not rejoin a regional pact to regulate greenhouse gases despite the urging of the state's congressional delegation, a spokesman said on Tuesday.

Massachusetts helped form the pact, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, with governors from states in the US Northeast, in the absence of federal policy to regulate the gases scientists link to global warming.

But late last year Romney, a Republican, pulled out of the agreement which seeks to cut carbon dioxide emissions at power plants 20 percent by 2019. Romney, who is expected to run for US president in 2008, said the pact would boost power prices for consumers and businesses.

Interest in regional regulation of greenhouse gases has grown after California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, and the state legislature passed a bill recently seeking to cut greenhouse emissions by about 25 percent by 2020. The Massachusetts congressional delegation wrote a letter to Romney on Tuesday asking him to rejoin the pact.

EDIT

http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/38070/story.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I always wondered how..
.. people as liberal as those in Mass. could vote for Romney?

But then I've wondered the same thing about CA and Arnold
and Ronnie....

It baffles the mind... but I don't guess the mind is working at
all in elections sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Checks and balances"

In MA we've seen that giving one party full control of both elected branches of the government can be bad news, and results in unbridled spending. The general philosphy has been to put an opposing governor in there to act as a buttress against runaway hubris.

...which worked just fine with Weld, but today's Republicans are not worth shit, as those who did not see through Romney during his bid are now discovering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC