|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
jpak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:00 AM Original message |
China to become world's largest wind power producer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BayCityProgressive
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. This makes sense for them. It is cheaper than bringing in fossil fuels from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
3. China is taking over the leadership role in the world............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BayCityProgressive
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. They also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cdnwannabe
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Because it's socialism to "them".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. answer: our corrupt government directed by k street criminals...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
7. And I thought the world's largest wind producer was Bill O'Reilly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoosier Dem
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Not sure if that's wind or just plain hot air. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. LOL! Yeah, he does break a lot of wind from his piehole. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. Time to crunch some numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. in the rural areas they use high sulfur coal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yes - 150 million kW of wind generating capacity by 2020 is nothing to cheer about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Glad we agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Only on the DU E&E forum is 50 G"W" of wind capacity "peanuts" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. As Einstein said when he was asked if he liked his sister... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. 50 G"W" of new Chinese wind capacity is more than China has planned for new nuclear capacity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. So they're putting all their effort into coal then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. China's rapid economic growth is unsustainable and they are going to have to deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. That I agree with, without reservation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. What number are we comparing against? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. "these predictions appear to be made without any consideration of..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Only in the world of the blind optimist is it significant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. and 30 GW of new Chinese nuclear is even less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Well no, it's about twice as much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. The *name plate* wind capacity is 150 GW, which, as we all know, is only 50 G"W" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 07:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. That's because I'm a dumbass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Tue Jan-16-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Maybe someday China will liberate us. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC