Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Corps Finds Five Massachusetts Dams "Deficient" - Boston Globe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:47 PM
Original message
Army Corps Finds Five Massachusetts Dams "Deficient" - Boston Globe
Five Massachusetts dams have been cited by the Army Corps of Engineers as structurally deficient, raising questions about the future pricing of flood insurance for cities and towns in which the dams are situated.

The dams -- located in Canton, Chicopee, Lowell, Springfield, and West Springfield, according to an Army Corps spokesman -- were listed among 146 levees nationwide considered unsuitable for a flood such as the one Hurricane Katrina wrought upon New Orleans in 2005. "After Katrina we had to take a hard look," said Corps regional spokesman Tim Dugan. "It's really up to the communities to determine how they proceed with these projects."

Dugan said this round of inspections was more vigorous than previous ones because of the post-Katrina scrutiny on levee safety. This time around, he said, violations such as overgrown vegetation and animal burrows were listed as structural deficiencies, while they were omitted in previous years. Many of the dams in question were built by the Army Corps of Engineers in the 1930s.

The findings angered some local officials who say that the inspection reports amount to alarmism and could actually prove detrimental to the safety of Massachusetts dams. "This sort of alarm, without the scientific or agricultural background or the engineering background to go with it, is unfortunate," said Mayor Michael Bissonette of Chicopee.

EDIT

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2007/01/30/five_mass_dams_found_deficient/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. "actually prove detrimental to the safety of Massachusetts dams"
Why, are they going to have their dam feelings hurt?

What an ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, I suppose that's better than finding "five defective Massachusetts DEMS"

rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC