Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Millions To Go Hungry, Waterless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:51 AM
Original message
Millions To Go Hungry, Waterless
I am going to expound on this later on my blog, and also include some news regarding the drastic measures Australia will now take to give people drinking water. The one thing I did want to type in response to this report now however, is to the U.S Congress: STAND UP FOR THE PEOPLE OF YOUR COUNTRY AND THIS PLANET AND STOP THIS GD WAR IN IRAQ/IRAN/AFGHANISTAN AND WHEREVER ELSE, AND START WORRYING ABOUT THE FUTURE NOW. And that goes for all of us actually. It is time to wake up. More later.
~~~~~~~

Millions To Go Hungry, Waterless


Published on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 by Reuters
Millions to Go Hungry, Waterless: Climate Report
by Rob Taylor

Rising temperatures will leave millions more people hungry by 2080 and cause critical water shortages in China and Australia, as well as parts of Europe and the United States, according to a new global climate report.

By the end of the century, climate change will bring water scarcity to between 1.1 and 3.2 billion people as temperatures rise by 2 to 3 Celsius (3.6 to 4.8 Fahrenheit), a leaked draft of an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report said.

Rising temperatures will leave millions more people hungry by 2080 and cause critical water shortages in China and Australia, as well as parts of Europe and the United States, according to a new global climate report. The report, due for release in April but detailed in The Age newspaper, said an additional 200 million to 600 million people across the world would face food shortages in another 70 years, while coastal flooding would hit another 7 million homes.

"The message is that every region of the earth will have exposure," Dr Graeme Pearman, who helped draft the report, told Reuters on Tuesday. "If you look at China, like Australia they will lose significant rainfall in their agricultural areas," said Pearman, the former climate director of Australia's top science body, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization.

Africa and poor countries such as Bangladesh would be most affected because they were least able to cope with greater coastal damage and drought, said Pearman. The IPCC was set up in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization and the U.N. Environment Program to guide policy makers globally on the impact of climate change. The panel is to release a report on Friday in Paris forecasting global temperatures rising by 2 to 4.5 Celsius (3.6 to 8.1 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels by 2100, with a "best estimate" of a 3C (5.4 F) rise.

skip:

"The projections in the report that comes out this week are based on the assumption that we are slow to respond and that things continue more-or-less as they have in the past."Some scientists say Australia -- the world's driest inhabited continent -- is suffering from "accelerated climate change" compared to other nations.
© Reuters 2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. We need Gore ,RestoreGore!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry no
I have a great admiration for Mr Gore based largely on what he's done since his presidential run. I think what he's doing now, trying to educate the people is invaluable and that he deserves all the praise he's getting for his efforts.

But do not NEED President Gore or President Anyone. We NEED to take action ourselves. Change our expectations, start acting and Purchasing accordingly, and pressuring those in authority - EPA officials, Energy policy makers, energy corps, and certainly that includes elected officials and certainly a President Gore would probably be more sympathetic and helpful to our cause than any other potential candidate but no president is going to be able to do anything without the political will of the people.

Unlike going to war, mitigating the effects of the climate crisis can not be done unilaterally...Everyone has to take part and it has to be lead by the grassroots not by the top...It Can't be lead by the top and certainly will not be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well put!
It's up to us... no great changes have *ever* happened from the top-down. It's *always* bottom-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. YankeyMCC: Thank you. Well said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Who is going to implement policy on our behalf?
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 04:50 PM by orpupilofnature57
Beautiful thought but a bit Nieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The naivete is expecting political leaders to save us
We can't wait for policy...we have to lead policy...

Labor reform didn't come from political leaders it came from the people.

The early environmental wins didn't come from political leadership it came from grassroots efforts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Your right ,GreenPeace
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 05:57 PM by orpupilofnature57
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. We already have him
What do you think he's doing now? And really, what we need is US to start facing reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Educating people is great ,Policing Industry is what's needed..
...A person that won't knuckle under to politics and image. Gore/Kennedy 2008!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's not going to take that long.
Twenty years, maybe thirty. That's it. All of the previous projections about how rapid this climate change event will take are wrong. Every time they redo the models and adjust for "reality on the ground", the timeline shrinks.

As for the war and it distracting us... your right. And that may also be part of the plan.

I've come to the conclusion that the powers that be (the folks behind * and Darth and all the rest, the money people) have already decided that we are boned. That there isn't anything we can do, so therefore they plan for a future with a whole lot less people on the planet. Billions less. And their concern is how to plan for that, and then to bring it about as rapidly as possible (so that their plans on how to survive are acted upon within their lifetimes). tinfoil perhaps, but how else do you explain our rush to fascism and war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. We just have no idea...
and you're right, the models keep changing as we learn more and more.

The positive feedback loops are discouraging, but we can't afford to give up hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. So true. We must hope for our children and pass it on to them!
We simply cannot let them or Mother Earth down. And the power for change is in us all, and that is why it needs to be brought out from the bottom up. Hopefully, the more we learn will lead us to ways of dealing with it more effectively as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. It's not tinfoil to me at all
But it sure the hell is evil. The Bush family is known for supporting "eugenics" so I have no doubt they have done some sort of statistics on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Agreed
> I've come to the conclusion that the powers that be (the folks behind * and Darth and all the
> rest, the money people) have already decided that we are boned. That there isn't anything we
> can do, so therefore they plan for a future with a whole lot less people on the planet. Billions
> less. And their concern is how to plan for that, and then to bring it about as rapidly as possible
> (so that their plans on how to survive are acted upon within their lifetimes).

I think that this guess is far closer than most that I've seen for the next few decades ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Ever read Ben Elton's "Stark"?
http://www.amazon.com/Stark-Ben-Elton/dp/0751501999

"Stark has more money than God and the social conscience of a dog on a croquet lawn. What's more, they know the Earth is dying, so deep in Western Australia a planet-sized plot takes shape..."

Makes you wonder... :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. No... but I will now! Thanks.
However, western Australia is not where I'd pick.

New Zealand, maybe, US Northwest won't be too bad.

Of course, the absolute best place to be is just where a certain family recently purchased a huge chunk of land, right next to the Rev. Moon. Paraguay. Global warming will affect the interior parts of Paraguay the least of almost any land mass.

Funny how that works out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Australia...
Is where they built their private spaceport - In Stark, they do a complete runner. Don't think we're quite at that level. Yet. I hope...

I'm not sure about paraguay, btw - on the projections I've seen, it take quite a beating. It's probably the only place that would have him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC