Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bartlett (R-MD) Points To GAO Report As Proof That Conventional Oil Peak Has Arrived - Platts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:03 PM
Original message
Bartlett (R-MD) Points To GAO Report As Proof That Conventional Oil Peak Has Arrived - Platts
A draft US Government Accountability Office report finds that, though it is difficult to assess whether the world has reached "peak oil," a large number of experts surveyed for the report believe the world may have reached the peak for conventional petroleum supplies, said Representative Roscoe Bartlett, Republican-Maryland.

Bartlett, who has raised concerns that the world has produced more oil than remains in reserves, ordered the report from GAO -- the nonpartisan investigative arm of Congress -- and will release it within the next month.

He said the report authors did not get a fix on how much oil is left in the world because principal oil suppliers would offer no information about how much oil they have left.

"They have no reason to tell us and little reason to be truthful," Bartlett said, so it is "very difficult to determine a date specific" when the world will reach peak oil.

EDIT

http://www.energybulletin.net/26644.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bartlett deserves some kind of medal
for dogged persistence in the face of blank, brain-dead indifference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sadly the GAO is the boyscout in the room that all the repukes ignore. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well that could be good news
This will encourage developement in alternative energy sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well that could be good news
This will encourage developement in alternative energy sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. No reason to tell us? NATIONALIZE THEM NOW!
Frickin GRRR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bartlett's not talking about Exxon. He's talking about the OPEC
countries plus Russia and the former Soviet states like Kazakhstan.

Back in the '80s, and perhaps today, OPEC quotas were set as a percentage of reserves. At one point, Saddam Hussein wanted to pump and sell more oil to support his war against Iran. Remember, we were helping him, but he needed more cash.

So what did Saddam do? He upped by a factor of 2 or so the amount of reserves that Iraq sat on. The next year, so did every other OPEC country. For many countries, those numbers have not been revised in response to constant pumping or to announced expansions of old fields or finds of new fields.

At this point, the numbers are entirely speculative. The Saudis, who are the largest producer, appear to lie all the time through their own national oil company Aramco. They kicked out the western oil companies back in the '70s and Exxon may not know any more than anyone else. To the Saudis, the big western oil companies are only customers.

Unfortunately, for the western companies, countries with oil remaining to be pumped who will let them in are getting more and more rare. They're pretty much out of Russia, Saudi, Iran, Kuwait, Venezuela, China. They have the North Sea, Nigeria and other parts of Africa (at least for the time being), the U.S., Canada and Australia. The fields are wearing out everywhere, and they're not finding much new. They're making huge profits now, but really, they're in liquidation and they don't control the markets as much as they used to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC