Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(US) Renewables Build Head of Steam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:05 AM
Original message
(US) Renewables Build Head of Steam
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=47717

U.S. renewable energy programs are building a head of steam. The questions surrounding the movement are whether such initiatives are reliable, cost effective and environmentally beneficial or whether they are merely feel-good efforts.

Renewable energy tied to wind and solar would have difficulty penetrating markets unless government interceded and provided tax breaks or instructed utilities to provide some green offerings. The goal is to create demand, which in turn attracts providers to the field and ultimately leads to the development of newer and better products and services. The end result is a cleaner and healthier environment.

"Without the incentives, the market penetration is very small," says Lisa Frantzis, director of renewable energy programs for Navigant Consulting, at a talk before the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy unit. "If you add the incentives, the level of activity significantly jumps."

Right now, 22 states have renewable portfolio standards while 9 more are considering rules to require utilities to provide some power from green sources. The federal government, meantime, may do the same. While Congress has failed to pass those measures in the past, the thinking now is that such action is inevitable.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Argh!
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 12:10 PM by kirby
I get so mad when I read these things. They always qualify their findings by saying they might not be as 'cost effective' as oil. Yet, no one factors in the trillions of dollars in wars or thousands of lost lives or cost of proping up dictators. All of those costs are never discussed and simply passed onto future generations to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So true. I get the funny feeling we won't ever need to launch a war against,
for instance, India or Australia or half of Africa to protect our wind power interests.........

If we count the TRUE costs of this War Without End, including the daily cost of waging it, the American deaths, the American disabilities, the loss of international goodwill, etc etc etc, we CANNOT AFFORD, as a nation, to use oil. All the alternatives are MUCH cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC