Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Regulators give Duke partial assurance on nuclear costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:00 PM
Original message
Regulators give Duke partial assurance on nuclear costs
http://washington.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2007/03/19/daily19.html

The N.C. Utilities Commission has issued an order that seeks to assure Duke Energy Corp. it can recover its planning costs for a proposed nuclear plant through future rate cases, whether or not the plant is built.

The order appears to give less than the full approval the utility had sought. Duke spokeswoman Paige Sheehan says the company welcomes the ruling as a positive assertion of the need to keep nuclear energy an option in North Carolina. But lawyers for Duke are reviewing the order to see if the company will still need to ask the N.C. General Assembly for legislation to clarify the issue.

Duke plans to spend about $125 million this year on planning for the proposed William S. Lee plant in South Carolina. Duke sought specific assurances on whether the North Carolina share of those costs would be recovered in a timely manner.

Opponents objected, contending the company already could recover such costs under proper conditions. They said Duke was seeking broad approval of its planning costs before the commission could review them.

<more>

Hold on to your wallet, the nukes may (or may not) be coming your way...

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good think you're not anti-nuclear
Otherwise I'd have to ask you about subsidies for PV installations. Again.

But not the one for your home, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC