Democrats embrace tough military stance

[papau]

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/08/14/democrats_embrace_tough_military_stance/

Democrats embrace tough military stance
Sharpen message on foreign policy
By Rick Klein, Globe Staff | August 14, 2005

WASHINGTON -- After months of internal debate and closed-door discussions, Democrats have begun to develop a more aggressive foreign policy that focuses heavily on threats they say are being neglected by the Bush administration, while avoiding taking a contentious stance on Iraq.

Democrats are also calling for better pay and benefits for soldiers and heightened efforts to protect mass transit and other potential terrorist targets.

The emerging message among Democrats reflects a recognition that winning congressional and presidential elections in the post-Sept. 11 era requires candidates to establish a willingness to use America's military might and keep the nation safe, according to party leaders and strategists.

Despite pressure from liberal groups calling for a quick exit from Iraq, several of the party's White House aspirants and congressional leaders are calling for the United States to intensify efforts to bring stability to the nation before troops come home.

Beyond that, they are endorsing a broader vision for how US power should be exerted, one that includes military involvement in humanitarian missions as well as a quick response to imminent security threats.<snip>

[fasttense]

1. This is just stupid.

The polls clearly indicate the American public has had enough of the useless war in Iraq. Democrats should come out with a clear plan on getting us out. They are losing a good opportunity.

[RethugAssKicker]

2. Here we go again.... trying to be Republican-lite.

Isn't it clear yet that war IS NOT THE ANSWER!!!

[H5N1]

3. Maybe they're all making money

Plenty to go around.