Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Revisiting 9/11 Failures (Senators want report released)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 02:30 AM
Original message
Revisiting 9/11 Failures (Senators want report released)
Senators are renewing calls for the declassification of a CIA report documenting the agency’s mistakes in preventing the 2001 attacks.

Web Exclusive
By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
Newsweek
Updated: 4:13 p.m. ET Jan 31, 2007

Jan. 31, 2007 - ... The report, prepared by the CIA’s inspector general, is the only major 9/11 government review that has still not been made publicly available ...

In a letter sent just this week, three panel members—including Intelligence Committee chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller and ranking Republican Christopher Bond—revived the issue and asked that an executive summary of the report be declassified “without delay” and released to the public.

The letter was addressed to outgoing Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte, but Oregon’s Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden—who has made the issue a personal crusade—said he intends to press the new DNI designate, J. Michael McConnell, on the matter at his confirmation hearings Thursday ...

Wyden added that if McConnell doesn’t reverse the decision made by Negroponte in refusing to declassify the report, he intends to use admittedly cumbersome intel-committee procedures to try to force the release of at least some of the inspector general’s findings. One concern, he said, is that “a desire for political security” is influencing the Bush administration’s refusal to greenlight the release of the document ...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16907952/site/newsweek/
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is going to open a can of worms
It seems that everything they did was to hide a failure or a wrong doing. The things that are coming out in the Libby trial, heckuva job Brownie saying LA failures were by design of the Bush administration during hurricane Katrina etc.... No, or virtually no investigation by the Republic controlled congress on this issue I think is just more of the same, and a can of worms to be opened. I hope it screws with about 21 of the '08 senate races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. there's must be..
soooo much to hide...hmmm? is it because 9/11 was indeed an inside WH job headed by PNACers, Bushco, Halliburton, Carlyle Group, the Saudis/Osamas & Tricky Darth Dicky, etc. ....treasons of the highest criminal offenses...IMPEACH NOW!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Come on! Let those worms out!
The worms are in the can saying, "Let me out! Let me out!"

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Possible that without 'political edit' it could cripple the Repugs??
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 12:19 PM by IWantAChange
With the MSM having removed their blinders this could possibly, I repeat possibly, be a true watershed event for politics in this country.

Yes, I am a conspiracy theorist of sorts.


:beer: let the good times begin!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush made a deal with the Taliban (terrorists) via the CIA shortly before 9/11
Bush stopped any and all investigations by the CIA -- and the FBI --concerning the Taliban, because Bush Inc was negotiating a oil deal.

See:

SMOKING GUN: The Evidence that May Hang G.W. Bush
Part III
John O'Neill: Was He a Casualty of the Bush Administration?


http://archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=7479

__________________________________________


"No longer is it just the fear of being attacked by international terrorist organizations -- attacks against Americans and American interests overseas. A lot of these groups now have the capability and the support infrastructure in the United States to attack us here if they choose to do so."
-- John P. O'Neill, 1996

Until he resigned in August of 2001, John O'Neill was the director of counterterrorism for the FBI's New York office, not far from the WTC. O'Neill investigated the bombings of the World Trade Centre in 1993, a US base in Saudi Arabia in 1996, the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar-Es-Salaam in 1998, and the USS Cole.

In the course of these investigations, he became one of the world's top experts on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, determined to hunt Bin Laden and his followers down and bring them to justice. Those who worked with him said he “lived, breathed and ate terrorism.” A scrappy, stubborn Irishman with a quick temper, a fondness for the ladies, and a reputation for being brutally blunt on some occasions, and pushy on others, O'Neill was often frustrated by the button-down boundaries of the modern FBI. But he was one of the best sleuths the agency had – as anyone who worked with him would be quick to acknowledge. U.S. attorney Mary Jo White says this of O’Neill: "John went at it comprehensively, yielding things from people in London or people in Yemen we never otherwise would have gotten." Another admirer, former FBI director Louis Freeh remembers O’Neill as “ the paramount, most knowledgeable agent we had in the FBI, probably in the government, with respect to counterintelligence matters."

After years of investigating OBL and Al Qaeda, O’Neill came to the conclusion that "All the answers, everything needed to dismantle Osama bin Laden's organization can be found in Saudi Arabia." That conviction went with him to his grave. Unfortunately for O’Neill and 3,000 other men and women, at every turn after January 2001, the Bush administration blocked the efforts of the “most knowledgable agent it had” to investigate Saudi ties to Bin Laden.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I am just so frustrated that Smirky Dumbass is not being impeached. WTF is Congress waiting for?
:shrug: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nabia2004 Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick & Nominated
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. It contains damning evidence of ONLY bush* and REPUKE failures.
If it contained ANY "Clinton" failures, you can be goddamned sure it would have been released long ago!

THAT's the ONLY reason it hasn't been released, along with all the other "reports".

And don't forget, this is the REPUKE report, not an "impartial" report that is damanded by the subject - which is MILD in comparison to the WHOLE TRUTH...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC