Why Smart Cops Do Dumb Things

[Ian David]

By Bruce Schneier 02:00 AM Feb, 22, 2007

Since 9/11, we've spent hundreds of billions of dollars defending ourselves from terrorist attacks. Stories about the ineffectiveness of many of these security measures are common, but less so are discussions of why they are so ineffective. In short: Much of our country's counterterrorism security spending is not designed to protect us from the terrorists, but instead to protect our public officials from criticism when another attack occurs.

Boston, Jan. 31: As part of a guerilla marketing campaign, a series of amateur-looking blinking signs depicting characters in Aqua Teen Hunger Force, a show on the Cartoon Network, were placed on bridges, near a medical center, underneath an interstate highway and in other crowded public places.

Police mistook these signs for bombs and shut down parts of the city, eventually spending more than $1 million sorting it out. Authorities blasted the stunt as a terrorist hoax, while others ridiculed the Boston authorities for overreacting. Almost no one looked beyond the finger pointing and jeering to discuss exactly why the Boston authorities overreacted so badly. They overreacted because the signs were weird.

If someone left a backpack full of explosives in a crowded movie theater, or detonated a truck bomb in the middle of a tunnel, no one would demand to know why the police hadn't noticed it beforehand. But if a weird device with blinking lights and wires turned out to be a bomb -- what every movie bomb looks like -- there would be inquiries and demands for resignations. It took the police two weeks to notice the Mooninite blinkies, but once they did, they overreacted because their jobs were at stake.

This is Cover Your Ass security, and unfortunately it's very common.

<snip>

Once you think about this in terms of CYA, it starts to make sense. The Transportation Security Administration wants to be sure that if there's another airplane terrorist attack, it's not held responsible for letting it slip through. One year ago, no one could blame the TSA for not detecting liquids. But since everything seems obvious in hindsight, it's basic job preservation to defend against what the terrorists tried last time.

More:
http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,72774-0.html?tw=rss.index

[Buzz Clik]

1. Quote of the day:

Much of our country's counterterrorism security spending is not designed to protect us from the terrorists, but instead to protect our public officials from criticism when another attack occurs.

Gold star material.

[TomInTib]

2. Spot-on. My girlfriend and I went thru LaGuardia with each other's boarding pass.

Just to see if we could do it.

We got all the way through Security and I asked to speak to a Supervisor. A woman less than 5 feet tall came out of a cubicle that was taller than I am (6+ ft) and asked me what I wanted.

I told her that I would like to know how we got through all of that with what we had - you know how they hold your ID and boarding pass and look up and down at you and your ID. She said that they weren't really looking at ID, just to see if our boarding passes had any "symbols" on them and, besides, if any mistakes had been made, it was the "other company's fault".

I asked her what "other company" she was talking about. She told me to get on my way.

By the way, my ID pic was when I had really long (half-way down my back) hair and I currently wear it much shorter.
My girlfriend's ID had her hair pulled back and she was wearing it down at the time.
And we were both wearing sunglasses.

And then we boarded the airplane the same way.

"Thank you for flying American, Mr. H****n."
No way do I look like someone named Beth.