Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times' Nicholas D. Kristof article on unnamed Wilson saying no WMD got WH going before oped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 09:21 PM
Original message
New York Times' Nicholas D. Kristof article on unnamed Wilson saying no WMD got WH going before oped
Tweety on hardball seems confused as to why all the get Wilson work that was done in the WhiteHouse before Wilson's NYT op-ed. Well it seems New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof wrote an article that cited an unnamed former ambassador who had gone on a fact-finding mission to Africa and had returned discounting the suspicions of Iraqis buying uranium.
=============================================================================


However, in spring 2003, after the invasion of Iraq, it was becoming increasingly obvious that the administration’s dire WMD warnings were hollow. Wilson began to speak privately with journalists about his trip.

New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof wrote an article that cited an unnamed former ambassador who had gone on a fact-finding mission to Africa and had returned discounting the suspicions of Iraqis buying uranium. Cheney grew curious about this mission that had been undertaken because of his expressed interest but that had not led to a formal report back to the Vice President.

After figuring out the identity of Kristof’s source, the White House also prepared to retaliate against Wilson, who was emerging as the first Washington establishment figure to accuse the administration of manipulating the WMD intelligence.

The White House was determined to nip in the bud any “revisionist history” about the integrity behind the march to war. In his memoir, Wilson cited sources telling him that a meeting in Cheney’s office led to a decision “to produce a workup” to discredit Wilson.

Lewis Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff, asked Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman, a neoconservative ally in the State Department, to prepare a memo on Wilson. Dated June 10, 2003, Grossman’s report included a paragraph, marked secret, that referred to CIA officer “Valerie Plame” as Wilson wife.

On June 11, Libby also heard from CIA official Robert Grenier that Wilson’s wife worked in the CIA unit that sent Wilson to Africa, Grenier later testified.
CIA Director George Tenet also mentioned to Cheney that Wilson’s wife worked for the CIA and had a hand in arranging Wilson’s trip to Niger. Cheney passed that information on to Libby in a conversation on June 12, 2003, according to Libby’s notes. <snip>



Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/030707.html

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Busy little beavers, weren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has Tenet testified or stated this publicly?
"CIA Director George Tenet also mentioned to Cheney that Wilson’s wife worked for the CIA and had a hand in arranging Wilson’s trip to Niger."

Frankly, I have no issues with Plame suggesting her husband, if, in fact, she did. Her work in the agency would have made her a person who probably would have been consulted and why not suggest someone like her husband who had the resume to make him an ideal candidate to evaluate the evidence? I mean, if the evidence wasn't fabricated, I doubt Joe Wilson would ruin his reputation trying to spin a falsehood that it was.

Still, I'd really like to know the minutae of who and how the decision was made to send Joe....because if it did come from the OVP, that puts an entirely different spin on the whole attack on Wilson/Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I believe Tenet said he told Cheney - and noted he had not said she chose her husband because that
would not have been possible given her position in the pecking order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC