Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's secret army: Blackwater fights outside the law, takes direction from radical christian right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:27 AM
Original message
Bush's secret army: Blackwater fights outside the law, takes direction from radical christian right
Meet the American mercenaries of Blackwater, who fight outside of the law and take direction from the radical Christian right

By JEREMY SCAHILL
March 21, 2007 4:02:04 PM


In September 2000, just months before its members would form the core of the Bush White House, the Project for a New American Century released a report called Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. In laying out PNAC’s vision for overhauling the US war machine, the report recognized that “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor.” A year to the month later, the 9/11 attacks would provide that catalyst: an unprecedented justification
to forge ahead with this radical agenda molded by a small cadre of neoconservative operatives who had just taken official power.



The often-overlooked subplot of the wars of the post-9/11 period is the outsourcing and privatization they have entailed. From the moment the Bush team took power, the Pentagon was stacked with ideologues like Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Stephen Cambone, and with former corporate executives — many from large weapons manufacturers — like Under Secretary of Defense Pete Aldridge (Aerospace Corporation), Army Secretary Thomas White (Enron), Navy Secretary Gordon England (General Dynamics), and Air Force Secretary James Roche (Northrop Grumman). The new civilian leadership at the Pentagon came into power with two major goals: regime change in strategic nations and the enactment of the most sweeping privatization and outsourcing operation in US military history — a revolution in military affairs. After 9/11 this campaign became unstoppable.

The swift defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan emboldened Rumsfeld and the administration as they began planning for the centerpiece of the neoconservative crusade: Iraq. From the moment the US troop buildup began in advance of the invasion, the Pentagon made private contractors an integral part of the operations. Even as the US gave the public appearance of attempting diplomacy, behind closed doors Halliburton was being prepped for its largest operation in history. When US tanks rolled into Baghdad in March 2003, they brought with them the largest army of private contractors ever deployed in a war. By the end of Rumsfeld’s tenure, there were an estimated 100,000 private contractors on the ground in Iraq — an almost one-to-one ratio to active-duty US soldiers. To the great satisfaction of the war industry, before Rumsfeld stepped down, he took the extraordinary step of classifying private contractors as an official part of the US war machine. In the Pentagon’s 2006 Quadrennial Review, Rumsfeld outlined what he called a “roadmap for change” at the DoD , which he said had started in 2001. It defined the “Department’s Total Force” as “its active and reserve military components, its civil servants, and its contractors — constitut its warfighting capability and capacity. Members of the Total Force serve in thousands of locations around the world, performing a vast array of duties to accomplish critical missions.”

Coming as it did in the midst of an open-ended, loosely defined global war, this formal designation represented a radical rebuke of the ominous warnings laid out by President Eisenhower in his farewell address to the nation decades earlier during which he envisioned the “grave implications” of the rise of “the military-industrial complex.” In 1961, Eisenhower declared, “The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.” What has unfolded in the ensuing years and particularly under the Bush administration is nothing less than the very scenario Eisenhower darkly prophesied.
Refresh | +15 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. We will truly regret the folly of outsourcing our military to private contractors.
When the money's gone, what will be their motivation to stay? When someone offers a higher salary, what will stop them from turning on us?When they do atrocities in our name. who will be responsible?

It's all about privitizing the profits and publicizing the risks. These people are playing us for the suckers that we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Could we get Congress to pass a law that puts a bounty on Blackwater and other mercenaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep it is exactly what Ike warned us about
Too bad we do not have Generals like him now that would blow the whistle on this illegal private army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. We do. The Republican leadership fired them. (nt)
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 08:06 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. This should be on the greatest page.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who will defend the legitimate government from these criminals
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 07:52 AM by bemildred
once the US Army is completely destroyed in Iraq? When will the Neocons "cross the Rubicon", use the mercenaries to take control of Washington DC? Who will fight them when they do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. We share the same fantasy -- and variations of it

Many of these people are very highly paid -- unlike our military. Their allegence is to that money and to the monied -- not to our country.

This is something to be extremely wary of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes, thank you, but it is not fantasy.
History is littered with such occurrences, and there is no reason at all to think things are different now, or these people are different, or this country is different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is there a link to this? Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oops. sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. And their in-house counsel is...Ken Starr! They're making how much
a day in gov't contracts? I recently heard the figure somewhere and it was astonishing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. I would like to see the criteria for being part of this private army


Civilian / private army

Civilan / private loyaties

Not a good combination
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC