Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Satellite photo showing Atlanta Int. Airport's 5th runway was removed from Google Maps! WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:59 PM
Original message
Poll question: The Satellite photo showing Atlanta Int. Airport's 5th runway was removed from Google Maps! WTF?
Edited on Wed May-30-07 11:59 PM by Up2Late
Did anyone else notice that the Satellite photo showing the construction of Atlanta's 5th runway (built over the major Interstate Highway I-285) was removed from Google Maps and replaced by the Pre-construction photo!

<http://maps.google.com/maps?client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&oe=utf-8&q=Atlanta+Airport&ll=33.636489,-84.427185&spn=0.04552,0.074329&t=k&z=14&om=1>

WTF? Did "homeland security" think "the terrorist" would see it as a target so they went with censorship???

Or did they think that, as long as they censor the "news" and the satellite photos, "the terrorist" won't notice that the giant Tunnel they drove through on their way to the Airport with big jet driving over it wasn't the new 5th runway?

I don't know, am I just over-reacting to this one, or does this qualify as another "slippery slope?"
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. welcome to the Amerikan security state....
Your papers, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
murloc Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldnt jump to conclusions
Edited on Thu May-31-07 12:05 AM by murloc
While I could easily see some nit-wit thinking they were doing us a security "favor", it would really really be stupid.

Go to any small airport and buy a sectional (essentially a pilots roadmap) and you'll get far far far more useful information than could be gleaned from a google photo.

My non-tinfoil hat explanation is that they replaced the photos for either licensing (they license these pics from other sources), or quality issues.

But the again, a nitwit could have declared them sensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, it sure wasn't a "quality issues" because it was a very high resolution photo...
...very clear with it zoomed all the way in.

And the 5th runway, completed over a year ago, was all over the media:

<http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2006/05/22/story1.html>

And detailed info is available to anyone on-line at this link: <http://www.airnav.com/airport/KATL>

Including the airport diagram: <http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0705/00026AD.PDF>

Soooo...:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
murloc Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. ummm.. exactly
Detailed information is readily available.

Detailed information HAS to be available if they expect anyone to land on it.

So it would be kinda stupid to think that changing the picture would have any safety effect.

As to the quality issue, I don't regularly view the Atlanta airport with Google Earth so I can't compare and contrast, however I can imagine a benign scenario where the entire region was replaced due to licensing or quality issues. (i.e. other parts of the region were upgraded in quality, even though it was an older image)

It may very well be some nit-wittery going with respect to national security, but imo its proably image licensing or something less malicious.

Think about it...why remove information about just ONE runway? If Google truly thought it was a security issue, the fools would have removed all the runways.

Regardless, its just speculation in the absence of further information.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. WTF that's crazy
Edited on Thu May-31-07 03:00 AM by donheld
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC