Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ind. Company Fires Guardsman, Apologizes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 10:53 AM
Original message
Ind. Company Fires Guardsman, Apologizes
Source: Associated Press

Ind. Company Fires Guardsman, Apologizes
By Associated Press
7:43 AM PDT, June 22, 2007

GREENSBURG, Ind. -- A company that sent a termination
letter to an Indiana National Guardsman serving in Iraq
has retracted it and apologized to his family.

A human resources manager at the Delta Faucet Co. plant
in Greensburg sent the letter last week saying David
Veerkamp was being fired because he had not returned
from a yearlong leave of absence.

He was called to active duty in June 2006 and remains
deployed to Iraq.

-snip-

Maj. Rob Palmer of the Employer Support of the Guard and
Reserve agency said managers at Delta's corporate office
in Indianapolis overrode the termination letter after he
talked to them.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-termination-letter,1,170658.story

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. probably a simple clerical error
Edited on Fri Jun-22-07 10:58 AM by northzax
the computer sees someone hasn't come back from a leave of absence and spits out a letter. the system was probably never coded to include indefinate leaves for Guard service, since that wasn't really an issue before 2003.

good for the company for being responsive and apologizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. True, but a symptom of how compartmentalized the cost of this war
actually is. Direct payment for the war is buried out of sight by taxation. It's probably not cost effective for the company to implement code that inserts the exception, but, consider the impact on the guardsman.

It's just the old SNAFU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC