Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Controversy in Seattle over publication of photos of "persons of interest"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
ificandream Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 03:42 PM
Original message
Controversy in Seattle over publication of photos of "persons of interest"
Those of you in the Seattle area may already be familiar with this, but for those, as I am, who aren't:

The FBI wants to talk to two men who were observed near the ferry boats in Washington state. They seemed, according to news reports, to be interested in the ship's operation, and were photographed. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer ran an initial story here http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/328396_ferries21.html and here: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/328396_ferries21.html with no picture of the two men. This caused some controversy and the editor responded to that here: http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/thebigblog/archives/120406.asp

A local TV station did run a picture of the two men here: http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_082007WAB_suspicious_ferry_passengers_TP.53aaa2a3.html. The Seattle Times also ran the picture, but on the second day of the story.

The P-I elected not to publish the photos, citing civil liberties and privacy concerns, which editors felt outweighed the newsworthiness of the images. "We have no confirmation that these men's behavior was anything but innocuous, and to forever taint them by associating them with terrorism under these circumstances is not consistent with our policy," said David McCumber, P-I managing editor. There's also the question of a possible lawsuit if they're wrong.

Conservatives I know think the PI should have published the pictures. As a former journalist myself, I argue what the PI did was correct and that until there's more evidence of wrongdoing, they shouldn't.

Your thoughts ...
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Given the track record of the FBI and CIA crying wolf every six weeks
to goose the Chimp's ratings, I don't blame the editors for thinking twice about libeling these men without anything more than suspicion.

If the FBI and the White House were more judicious in telling the public such things, and if the reality wasn't that EVERY SINGLE TIME this sort of bullshit gets publicized, a week later it is proven to be BULLSHIT, then there might be a more cooperative attitude.

I agree with the PI's decision not to defame these men without any evidence. If the FBI wants to find them, then go use all of your new Big Brother toys to track them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ificandream Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. ...and, of course, what isn't said...
... is that these guys could be Middle Eastern. The righties will complain that that's exactly the reason the pictures should be published. But this racial profiling shit and the losing of our civil liberties hurts all of us. You kinda wonder why the righties don't see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. If they were such "persons of interest", why didn't
the FBI keep track of them when they took the photo? They could have put a tail on them on the spot. Instead, they insinuate guilt in the newspapers?? Sure sounds fishy to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The FBI did not take the photo.
The photo was taken by the ferry workers, who noticed that the two men in question were not behaving like normal tourists. The reports and photo(s) were later turned over to the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Way to go Post-Intelligencer
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. they closed the coleman dock & rerouted ferries the other day
because someone abandoned their BONG in the bathroom.

a little jumpy over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC