Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Millions Risked on BAE Contract

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:52 AM
Original message
Millions Risked on BAE Contract
Hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money is being put at risk in huge new arms sales to the shaky regime in Saudi Arabia, the Guardian can disclose.

Government financial guarantees against the collapse of the Saudi ruling family have already been secretly given to the giant arms firm BAE Systems.

BAE is currently negotiating fresh contracts for weapons, advanced avionics and refurbished planes with a regime that is regularly accused of corruption on a massive scale.

cut



http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1094089,00.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. wonder if The Carlyle Group will be effected?
http://www.baesystems.com/newsroom/2001/240401news2.htm

don't know if any of the imaging devices are used -
Carlyle bought BAE's imaging plant back in 2001
possibly a backdoor way to profit as a subcontractor - not that Carlyle had knowledge of future needs :eyes:

BAE, in essence, is still supplying itself the part, just under revised ownership

BAE SYSTEMS North America has reached agreement with The Carlyle Group, Washington, DC, to spin out its Imaging Sensors business located at Milpitas, California. Imaging Sensors was previously part of BAE SYSTEMS Reconnaissance and Surveillance Systems of Syosset, New York. In the transaction, BAE SYSTEMS has provided the assets of Imaging Sensors to form a new company, Fairchild Imaging, Inc. Closing of the agreement occurred April 6, 2001.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No worries,
it says here in paragraph 3, subsection c, that any losses will be divided among the populace and off the backs of the workers! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC