http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/16/politics/campaigns/16DEMS.htmlDean's Speech on Iraq Brings Rebuttals From Rivals
By JODI WILGOREN and RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD
OS ANGELES, Dec. 15 — Howard Dean declared on Monday that "the capture of Saddam Hussein has not made America safer," provoking an avalanche of new attacks from rivals who have seized on Sunday's surprise news as a way of redrawing the foreign policy debate in the Democratic presidential campaign..."The difficulties and tragedies which we have faced in Iraq show the administration launched the war in the wrong way, at the wrong time, with inadequate planning, insufficient help, and at the extraordinary cost, so far, of $166 billion," he said. "The capture of Saddam does not end our difficulties from the aftermath of the administration's war to oust him." Dr. Dean, too, devoted significant chunks of his speech to the proliferation issue, saying he would also triple American financing to $30 billion over 10 years to combat unconventional weapons around the world, and ask allies to contribute the same amount...foreign policy (should) be guided by "the legitimacy that comes from the rule of law, the credibility that comes from telling the truth," "first-rate intelligence undiluted by ideology" and strength through "robust alliances and vigorous diplomacy."<snip>
THE COMMENTS:
Lieberman:"If he truly believes the capture of this evil man has not made America safer, then Howard Dean has put himself in his own spider hole of denial...I fear that the American people will wonder if they will be safer with him as president."
Clark: "The entire resistance in Iraq was not run by a pathetic ex-dictator hiding in a hole,...(the capture of Mr. Hussein was) only one step (toward success in Iraq, which would take) tens of billions of dollars," "enormous stamina" and renewed cooperation between the United States and Europe.
Edwards: while Mr. Hussein's capture "did not end the danger in Iraq," it had "kicked the door wide open for all of us to hope that sooner and not later democracy will thrive for the Iraqi people...."Prosecuting Saddam is not like restoring electricity or picking up garbage — it is one of the most politically sensitive and complex tasks facing a post-Saddam Iraq....America does not need a new doctrine of pre-emption; we need a new strategy of prevention."
Gepheart: "We can't beat George Bush by playing politics with foreign policy...We've got to stand up for what we think is right. That's what I've always done and that's what I'll always do."
Kerry: Democrats "deserve more than" a "foreign policy speech written by someone else."..."In a world where terrorist threats loom large, and they do, our fellow Americans are looking for real leadership...To earn your trust, we have to show through our own actions, and our own experiences, that our approach to national security and foreign policy is credible, legitimate, and the best way to defend our nation."