Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sudanese And Iraqi Meanings, by Hazem Saghieh

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 05:34 PM
Original message
Sudanese And Iraqi Meanings, by Hazem Saghieh
Between the American success in Sudan, which is also a success for Sudan, and the American failure in Iraq which is a failure for Iraq as well, the war stops. In Sudan, pressure was exerted on Omar Al Bashir's regime in order to reach a settlement that could bring an end to the war (21 years and 2 million killed), this would have been impossible to accept was it not for the pressures. Bashir is also expected to reach a similar settlement in Darfour which is facing an increasing humanitarian and economic crisis.

The pressures that were exerted by the American State Department have accomplished what the battles of the Pentagon failed to do. This leads us to two results: the rejection of war policies, whether American or not, even if their target was a regime like that of Saddam Hussein, and the second is welcoming pressure, be it American or not, when it targets a case of despotism and/or a civil war.

Colin Powell is accused of being a submissive employee, described by Bob Woodward as an extension of the old school in American politics that puts diplomacy before fighting and fears wars; considering them a threat to the established structure of peace and an invitation for uncontrollable chaos. This contradicts the new school that took over the Pentagon whose legacy is the glorification of war precisely because it is a threat to the structure of peace, which is established but fake.

Sudanese And Iraqi Meanings....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Always nice to see somebody who gets it:
This leads us to two results: the rejection
of war policies, whether American or not, even if their target
was a regime like that of Saddam Hussein, and the second is
welcoming pressure, be it American or not, when it targets a
case of despotism and/or a civil war.


After 2500 years the war machine has finally lost it's utility as
a tool of aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC