Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Corrects Itself on Arms (no chem arms in Iraq since 91)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 11:23 AM
Original message
CIA Corrects Itself on Arms (no chem arms in Iraq since 91)

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-cia1feb01.story
THE CONFLICT IN IRAQ
CIA Corrects Itself on Arms (no chem arms in Iraq since 91)
A report, the first of its kind, says Baghdad ended its chemical weapons program in '91.
By Greg Miller
Times Staff Writer

February 1, 2005

WASHINGTON — In what may be a formal acknowledgment of the obvious, the CIA has issued a classified report revising its prewar assessments on Iraq and concluding that Baghdad abandoned its chemical weapons programs in 1991, intelligence officials familiar with the document said.

The report marks the first time the CIA has officially disavowed its prewar judgments and is one in a series of updated assessments the agency is producing as part of an effort to correct its record on Iraq's alleged weapons programs, officials said.

The CIA's decision to distribute the report — titled "Iraq: No Large-Scale Chemical Warfare Efforts Since Early 1990s" — in classified channels underscores the awkwardness the agency faces as it continues to reconcile its prewar reporting with postwar realities in Iraq. Before the war, the CIA asserted that Iraq had stockpiled biological weapons and was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program.

A U.S. intelligence official said the document was "not a high-level report," meaning it was designed to supplant outdated assessments still on classified computer networks and was not meant to be called to the attention of President Bush or other senior government officials.<snip>

A Jan. 4 report focused on Scud missiles and other delivery systems. Intelligence officials said future reports would revise the agency's claims that Iraq had stockpiles of biological weapons and was rebuilding its nuclear weapons program. Those allegations were a centerpiece of the Bush administration's case for war with Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cdb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. oops!
It's official.Ok, can we end the war NOW??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johncoby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. There. They took responsibility. Now lets move on.
The word responsibility is truly hollow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Porter Goss
Genius at work. Talk about an agency that has been neutered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeing Red Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. i suppose it doesn't matter ...
Luckily, the bushies have plenty of secondary justifications ready for the war! the march of freedom can go on, unhindered by annoying "facts" that simply get in the way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC